Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,434 posts)
34. most critics believe their projections are superior to reality
Thu Apr 9, 2026, 06:16 PM
Apr 9

...and many of them spend almost all of their effort sowing cynicism about a party that many of them refused to support in the last election.

All of the movements that posture to reform the party are naturally exploited by people who never intend to show up on election day; exploited by people who want to dissuade Dems from showing up on election day.

All of the effort is just to denigrate the party and its principles, not on their efforts alone, but on the opposition's succes in succeeding; seemingly oblivious to the effect of their own divisive actions which almost never include any actual opposition against republicans.

They work to wedge support away from Democrats who were historically successful and able in ANY Democratic majority; most notably Sen. Schumer in the Biden term.

Tore down an incumbent president over Gaza, but can't be found today to oppose Trump's collusion with Israel. Where's the protests? Never mind.

And they denigrate the prosecutors of Trump, even as the convicted criminal and his DOJ mob purge those very prosecutors and lawyers from the Justice Dept. who the critics incredibly claim weren't investigating and prosecuting.

I mean, who attacks Donald Trump's prosecutors? Who does that? Who continues to make that their most pressing concern, and a prominent part of their messaging?

In Jack Smith's testimony to Congress, he testified that Trump bore responsibility for the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6.

The Special Counsel who inherited over 20 Garland prosecutors in what CNN described at the time as a "fast-moving investigation" was relying on evidence to be used in the indictment; in the court he was already appearing in when voters pulled the rug out from under his prosecution; on evidence that MERRICK GARLAND had amassed through over 1500 arrests and nearly as many convictions up to sedition of people these same prosecution critics derided as 'foot soldiers' and immaterial to convicting Trump.

That's supposed to be the genius of screaming nonsense at Garland (and I mean screaming because, they NEVER come with facts about the case they're supposedly so concerned about, just their clawing at the people prosecuting).

They can't credibly discuss the case because, they never bothered to look at the state of the evidence; read through the challenges and claims of privilege; discern what court was adjudicating those claims, what judge set the date of the hearing and when; never bothered to say ONE WORD about the Trump friendly judges and justices who delayed their hearings and judgments on the unprecedented appeals until right up until we voted; clueless that this is something Jack Smith wrote in his report which they conveniently ignore.

The fucking weirdness, though, of being the people who are dragging Garland at the same time Trump is dragging the people who prosecuted him.

And we're supposed to believe they give a shit about the prosecution? No more than we should believe they care about achieving a Democratic majority, ever.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Best news I've heard all day. BannonsLiver Apr 9 #1
I've been calling for him to step down for years. Intractable Apr 9 #2
I always compare minority leadership with Pelosi like in the Covid pandemic ALBliberal Apr 9 #3
Democrats are in desperate need of new leadership. dalton99a Apr 9 #4
We need strong leaders who are willing to step up and fight the good fight for our democracy Grim Chieftain Apr 9 #25
Leadership is mostly a procedural position that focuses on order and decoram. LeftInTX Apr 9 #28
Leadership is a lot more than that Mysterian Apr 9 #35
Well, I've been in a brawl where people were hurt. It sucks. It was at a political meeting. LeftInTX Apr 10 #36
just elect a Democrat bigtree Apr 9 #5
Exactly LeftInTX Apr 9 #10
Bravo! Democratic self-sabotage needs to stop. comradebillyboy Apr 9 #11
Your last sentence is undoubtedly true. BannonsLiver Apr 9 #30
most critics believe their projections are superior to reality bigtree Apr 9 #34
I don't think any human is infallable. comradebillyboy Apr 10 #40
I wasn't talking about you. BannonsLiver Apr 10 #43
All due respect angrychair Apr 9 #32
Thank you. Your response was better than mine would've been. nt druidity33 Apr 10 #38
Thank you Ziggy Beans Apr 10 #39
Kudos to our leadership! Hassin Bin Sober Apr 10 #41
I feel like this is sarcasm Ziggy Beans Apr 10 #42
He's not right for this period in our history, IMO. I'd be thrilled to be able to vote for someone else (Democratic). Crunchy Frog Apr 9 #6
He is now 75, it is time for him to retire so younger women & men irisblue Apr 9 #7
If AOC wins his seat, she will not be senate minority or senate majority leader. LeftInTX Apr 9 #8
the benefits to NY from a senior member of the Senate are immeasurable bigtree Apr 9 #9
Haven't heard much about Gillibrand lately...She would then be the senior senator from New York. LeftInTX Apr 9 #12
If Schumer retires in 28 SocialDemocrat61 Apr 9 #14
right bigtree Apr 9 #19
Klobuchar is running for governor. Fiendish Thingy Apr 9 #16
Dick Durbin is retiring JustAnotherGen Apr 10 #37
I keep reading "New York Dolls" Coventina Apr 9 #13
lol bigtree Apr 9 #21
Schumer will be 78 in 28 SocialDemocrat61 Apr 9 #15
He will, one way or another. Nt Fiendish Thingy Apr 9 #17
like Bernie? Skittles Apr 9 #33
He will retire in 2028 Fiendish Thingy Apr 9 #18
by choice, I'd think bigtree Apr 9 #20
Let's hope so. Nt Fiendish Thingy Apr 9 #23
I'm not one of the people obsessing on this as if he's some sort of obstacle to anything bigtree Apr 9 #24
I think this should allow for a gracious exit fujiyamasan Apr 9 #22
it's funny how the 'new era' seems to be fraught with so much uncertainty and regression bigtree Apr 9 #26
'You've got to know when to fold 'em..' Joinfortmill Apr 9 #27
No Tom Hagan now Pesky1 Apr 9 #29
He benefitted greatly from standing next to Nancy for so many years. Scrivener7 Apr 9 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New York polls are full o...»Reply #34