Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Disaffected

(6,371 posts)
8. Thanks. It is also apparently used informally in a legal setting.
Sun Mar 8, 2026, 02:47 AM
Sunday

Goggle sez:

The phrase “in for a penny, in for a pound” is sometimes used informally when discussing criminal liability, but it is not a legal term. It loosely describes doctrines like:

accomplice liability

conspiracy liability

felony-murder rule (U.S.)

All of which can result in someone who didn’t directly commit the act being punished similarly to the principal offender.


I have also seen it used in an English murder trial movie long ago which IIRC is where I picked up the expression.

Anyhow, it's a useful phrase no matter what the specific situation!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Alabama set to execute ma...»Reply #8