Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(61,519 posts)
3. Correction: You asked a hallucinating chatbot to answer a question. That isn't a deep dive. It's fake research.
Sat Mar 7, 2026, 12:36 PM
Saturday

You didn't identify the AI used.

Since you didn't say you checked every single detail of its answer, it's safest to assume you didn't.

Which means you offloaded factchecking to anyone reading that AI slop, taking zero responsibility for dumping possible misinformation onto DUers.

And by not identifying the AI tool, you made it impossible for anyone wanting to see if that AI would give the same answer twice to check it.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Interesting question and response jmbar2 Saturday #1
It's a response from a chatbot that can hallucinate at any time. Unless you check every detail of the highplainsdem Saturday #4
Re: AI Vigilantes, I've read that new updates have been made to the interrogation functions. Bongo Prophet Saturday #29
The beatings will continue until we completely forget that AI exists. jmbar2 Yesterday #30
Which makes me think of the disappearing pallets of dollars Bobstandard Saturday #2
Correction: You asked a hallucinating chatbot to answer a question. That isn't a deep dive. It's fake research. highplainsdem Saturday #3
From the Bing client LiberalArkie Saturday #6
Did you check every detail of the answer Bing's chatbot gave you with a source widely considered reliable? highplainsdem Saturday #7
Most was from Wikipedia, CNN, BBC, French news. LiberalArkie Saturday #11
Did you follow the links to the sources cited to see if they agreed with the AI-generated text? Chatbots highplainsdem Saturday #17
Let the scolding commence... Drum Saturday #5
There's an AI app for that jmbar2 Saturday #8
Karens are conservative. And conservatives like AI slop. I'm a liberal who doesn't think it's a good idea highplainsdem Saturday #9
Are you sure that all Karens are conservative? jmbar2 Saturday #10
Someone asked Claude about which party LiberalArkie Saturday #12
Well, this gets curiouser and curiouser... jmbar2 Saturday #13
Yea, it surprised the crap out of me and the guy.. He has a lot of videos comparing each AI with the same prompt LiberalArkie Saturday #15
The AI's at present are really stupid with assumptions and making decisions. LiberalArkie Saturday #16
Will check it out jmbar2 Saturday #18
"deep dive" WhiskeyGrinder Saturday #14
Definition of "deep dive" from Merriam-Webster: highplainsdem Saturday #20
exactly WhiskeyGrinder Saturday #21
At 78, I tend to let some one(thing) else to dive.. Although as a preteen my first book was Websters College dictionary LiberalArkie Saturday #23
Then let others who will do a real deep dive post deep dives to DU. You could have asked DUers to answer highplainsdem Saturday #24
Good point. I think I relied too much on the encyclopedias to much as a child as that just gave me the information that LiberalArkie Saturday #25
I am sorry to see your post getting hijacked jmbar2 Saturday #27
This tends to happen whenever people are discussing anything. The only way to have a nice peaceful discussion LiberalArkie Saturday #28
I remember a Soldier Army truck driver tried to steal some of the gold on his truck. The MP's caught him Jacson6 Saturday #19
The grift was deep during the Iraq War JCMach1 Saturday #22
Oddball hauled it away in his tank. Norrrm Saturday #26
Good one! I decided to use my browser's DuckDuckGo search engine AI to confirm my memory of the context Bongo Prophet Yesterday #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I did a AI deep dive into...»Reply #3