Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(61,409 posts)
66. You don't seem to understand that people choosing to use and promote a technology they know is unethical and
Mon Mar 2, 2026, 01:59 AM
Monday

harmful is obnoxious. Especially when they're posting on a message board for liberals and apparently deciding they can make a carveout for AI as something they don't need to apply liberal values to.

I'm doing what I can to make AI users here aware of the many reasons why they shouldn't use AI voluntarily. And some of them apparently don't care, which I find astonishing, disappointing - and, yes, obnoxious.

Posting AI slop here is a big FU to the people whose work was stolen to train the AI. That's obnoxious. I'd have a very hard time convincing any of the artists I know that the people posting AI slop of any type here care at all about the creatives whose work was stolen. And if there aren't continuing objections, it leaves the impression that other DUers are just as uncaring, just as unethical.

Which is a horrible look for what is supposed to be a liberal forum with liberal values.

And I'm the guy who may find himself unemployed an unemployable by the time I'm 50 because of AI. I would bet its a much bigger concern to my personal ability to survive than it is to you.


You don't have any idea how much AI affects me personally. But I've warned about AI since ChatGPT was released since it was immediately obvious it was harmful. And as time went on, more and more news stories and studies backed that up. If anything, I underestimated how harmful it would be, and how fast it would wreak damage.

I don't have kids of my own, but I'm close to my siblings' kids, and my extended family includes two developers in their 40s, with 7 young children between them, and wives (two of one of my brothers' daughters) who have not worked for many years; they'll have a nearly impossible time keeping their houses if those jobs are wiped out. One of those devs told his teenaged son he'd better forget his dream of becoming a videographer, because AI would probably wipe out that profession, and I hated hearing about that. My young relatives who are in school and very aware of AI aren't sure how to make any plans. That's terrible for kids.

I have a cousin in his 50s who works for UPS. He has a disabled wife and daughter. UPS is laying off a lot of employees, in part because of AI. His sister had been planning to return to teaching after years of caregiving, after their mother died, but with what AI has done to teaching, she doesn't think she can do it. I think the older of the two lawyers in the family might be fine even if a lot of lawyers lose their jobs, but the younger one might not be. The relatives who own some successful appliance stores are well off but their stores might not be as more people lose their jobs and have less money for appliances.

A data center may be built soon beside a town where one of my brothers and some of his kids and grandkids live.

Generative AI is making the future much bleaker for most people, and that's because of AI robber barons who stole the world's intellectual property for their private profit, and who have marketed their AI tools to businesses as a way to lay off workers. Using the tech dumbs people down, and it produces inferior work including code with security risks.

It's hyped anyway. But it shouldn't be hyped here.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Absolutely! pat_k Sunday #1
I'm glad you label it, but why bother posting what any chatbot says when it might give a different answer highplainsdem Sunday #7
Very true. AI generated content looks and sounds authoritative, even when it's not mdbl Sunday #10
I always question AI - ask for quotes, womanofthehills Sunday #14
That will NOT prevent it from lying. Ms. Toad Sunday #35
This is an AI Video... leftstreet Sunday #2
It's still slop. It's still dumb. Our most effective weapons against Trump and his regime are real news, highplainsdem Sunday #3
I thought the subject was labeling it leftstreet Sunday #5
I'm glad you agree with the labeling. I thought you posted that video as something that you felt highplainsdem Sunday #8
bwahahaha jmbar2 Sunday #4
No way ornotna Sunday #62
LOL. Sometimes we need to laugh at one form Ilsa Monday #71
With some small effort one can usually find the source of this plagiarized material. hunter Sunday #6
Ah, Liechtenstein! kurtyboy Sunday #18
I agree, but...... SergeStorms Sunday #9
They don't all add disclaimers, though, here on DU or on other websites - and most of the time they highplainsdem Sunday #12
I agree SergeStorms Sunday #34
Thanks! highplainsdem Sunday #53
Thank you !!!! This should be a DU rule. Trueblue1968 Sunday #11
Yes! SheltieLover Sunday #21
If people are posting AI generated text here withour saying it's AI, I agree that it should be labeled as such. ShazzieB Sunday #13
The AI overview is there to keep you in the google sandbox. hunter Sunday #47
Yes, and No ThreeNoSeep Sunday #15
Yes, they are committing fraud, i.e. plagurisim. paleotn Sunday #25
Academic researchers use other people's work all the time. (#bibliography) ThreeNoSeep Sunday #59
They cite other people's work. Other PEOPLE. Cite LLMs? paleotn Sunday #60
Theft? Nope. ThreeNoSeep Sunday #61
I'm sorry, but you're wrong. highplainsdem Sunday #28
Where are your citations for the above? jmbar2 Sunday #39
Citations for what's in the excerpt boxes? Those are quotes from the message I was replying to. highplainsdem Sunday #43
They're quotes, so they need ____________________ jmbar2 Sunday #45
Not when it's a quote from someone I'm replying to in an excerpt box in a reply following their message. highplainsdem Sunday #49
Agree 100%. Thank you! CaptainTruth Sunday #16
Is this a new rule or guideline? Joinfortmill Sunday #17
If not, should be. paleotn Sunday #22
I have no issue with this if it is a rule by the site owner Joinfortmill Sunday #23
They're wishing, not presenting. paleotn Sunday #26
You might want to read my post again. Joinfortmill Sunday #27
Do they have the ability to make policy? No. Then it's just wishing. paleotn Sunday #29
Read it. Joinfortmill Sunday #32
It's a request, starting with the word "please" - no more a rule or guideline than the many requests highplainsdem Sunday #33
Chill. Why the freaking anger? paleotn Sunday #36
I'm not angry. Joinfortmill Sunday #44
Then why is this such an issue for you? Seriously? paleotn Sunday #56
It is the way it was presented. Joinfortmill Sunday #57
It's a request, made because we have had chatbot responses posted here that weren't identified as highplainsdem Sunday #31
Perfectly good reasons why we should NEVER use AI for this forum. paleotn Sunday #19
Absolutely agreed! SheltieLover Sunday #20
Is this like blaming someone for holding a counterfeit banknote? Drum Sunday #24
I simply put many of these AI enthusiasts on my ignore list. hunter Sunday #40
Agreed! Drum Sunday #42
It's possible I decry this new industry more than highplainsdem does. hunter Sunday #55
Amen. Wednesdays Sunday #30
I'm here for the humans. carpetbagger Sunday #37
LOL! I hope we all are. Heaven help this board if very much of it turns into a place to trade highplainsdem Sunday #38
Do we need to know the political affiliation of the chatbot? MichMan Sunday #41
And their pronouns jmbar2 Sunday #46
This isn't in the TOS. It's a request made for the reasons explained in the OP. And identifying the chatbot helps highplainsdem Sunday #50
I come to DU to find out what other people think. AI doesn't think. It's "artificial!" nt LAS14 Sunday #48
Exactly. There are already too many responses from bots in a lot of other online forums. highplainsdem Sunday #58
I ask that an AI tag be added to the subject line so those of us who find AI revolting can easily Trash it a SheltieLover Sunday #51
I think a trigger warning might be more appropriate jmbar2 Sunday #52
It's not a trigger for me, but AI in subject makes it easier to trash in settings. SheltieLover Sunday #54
I'm starting to think you don't care about any other issue. FascismIsDeath Sunday #63
Really? I've posted about lots of other issues, here and on other platforms. highplainsdem Sunday #64
"AI slop" has became the equivalent of using "woke" as a pejorative. FascismIsDeath Sunday #65
You don't seem to understand that people choosing to use and promote a technology they know is unethical and highplainsdem Monday #66
Jawohl! LPBBEAR Monday #67
This. Martin68 Monday #68
Thank you highplainsdem. c-rational Monday #69
About the search engine AI overviews mentioned above... FemDemERA Monday #70
Very helpful - thanks jmbar2 Monday #72
This is the owners issue, not ours. Mosby Monday #73
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Please do not post AI-gen...»Reply #66