Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dalton99a

(93,540 posts)
1. Kick
Fri Feb 27, 2026, 06:52 PM
Friday
Simon
Charlotte NC · 10h ago

I have a 3D FDM printer at home that works just fine. At my company we use 3D printers both for prototyping (in plastics) and specific production parts (in metal)

I evaluated Desk Top Metal (DTM) back around 2018. As the article noted it was hugely hyped. What the article failed to cover was the significant limitations of the process which printed raw metal parts with a binder which then required sintering. During that sintering process the parts would shrink around 15%.

This was ok if you were printing a cube. For anything more complicated the shrinkage was not uniform. You needed a lot of trial and error to get an acceptable finished part since at that time the software to predict the shrinkage as "crude" (It has since improved a lot but is still complex and expensive).

My experience was DTM glossed over this crucial issue. Given they essentially ignored reality their implosion isn't surprising. Engineers deal in the art of the possible not hype.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Rise and Fall of a 3-...»Reply #1