MaddowBlog-Hegseth isn't done targeting Mark Kelly, despite legal defeat and DOJ moving on [View all]
Pete Hegseth and Jeanine Pirro launched related crusades. Both lost in court. Only one of them, however, had the sense to know when to quit.
Give it a break, Hegseth! | Hegseth isnât done targeting Mark Kelly, despite legal defeat and DOJ moving on www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
— jbuchana, NOW is the time to Resist! (@jbuchana.bsky.social) 2026-02-27T05:17:49.060Z
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/hegseth-isnt-done-targeting-mark-kelly-despite-legal-defeat-and-doj-moving-on
Not surprisingly, Kelly won. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, a George W. Bush-appointed jurist, blocked Hegseth from penalizing Kelly.
Secretary Hegseth relies on the well-established doctrine that military servicemembers enjoy less vigorous First Amendment protections given the fundamental obligation for obedience and discipline in the armed forces, Leon wrote.
Unfortunately for Secretary Hegseth, no court has ever extended those principles to retired servicemembers, much less a retired servicemember serving in Congress and exercising oversight responsibility over the military, the judge said.
This Court will not be the first to do so!
At that point, the smart move wouldve been for the Pentagon chief to call it a day and shift his focus back to all of his other enormous responsibilities. The former Fox News host did not, however, make the smart move. Politico reported:
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Tuesday ramped up his public spat with Sen. Mark Kelly, appealing a federal court ruling that blocked him from punishing the Arizona Democrat for advising troops not to follow illegal orders. [
]
The move reveals that Hegseth has no plans to tamp down his battle against Kelly, a potential 2028 presidential contender who has fought the allegations against him as a threat to free speech.
In a statement, Kelly said,
These guys dont know when to quit.
A federal judge told Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth that they violated my constitutional rights and chilled the free speech of millions of retired veterans. There is only one reason to appeal that ruling: to keep trampling on the free speech rights of retired veterans and silence dissent.
Lets also not overlook the timing:
On Monday, the public learned that Hegseths former Fox colleague, Jeanine Pirro, agreed to give up on a case against the Democratic military and intelligence veterans who appeared in the video.....
Pirro had the sense to move on and save herself additional embarrassment. Hegseth chose a less constructive path.
The opinion for Kelly was well written and restated basic First Amendment law. Hegseth is an idiot to try to overturn established law.