Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ShazzieB

(22,478 posts)

7. This is exactly what i was about to post. (Glad I read the comments first. 😄)

Reply to TheRickles (Reply #5)

Fri Feb 27, 2026, 02:56 PM

Feb 27

I would have thought the time for threatening criminal contempt charges is long past by now. IANAL or a judge, so I don't know what the criteria are for charging or how many warnings it's customary to give, but I can't help wondering wtf it's going to take.

Don't get me wrong; I love Schiltz' ruling. I just have questions!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

oberle Wednesdays

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Another federal judge just *roasted* DHS - and I'm not exaggerating. [View all] Ocelot II Feb 27 OP

I love it! CoopersDad Feb 27 #1

EXCELLENT! (nt) AZJonnie Feb 27 #2

Sadly, Stephen Miller, Toad Trump, Cos Play Kristie, and Bombastic Bondi just say: Make me! Attilatheblond Feb 27 #3

ding. this. AllaN01Bear Feb 27 #4

When will it be time to move beyond "threatening contempt" to "holding in contempt"? TheRickles Feb 27 #5

This is exactly what i was about to post. (Glad I read the comments first. 😄) ShazzieB Feb 27 #7

This judge isn't playing. Ocelot II Feb 27 #8

Thanks. So do you think he'll file against Rosen, the boss? TheRickles Feb 27 #9

Depends on what happens next. Will Rosen's staff comply, Ocelot II Feb 27 #10

K&R UTUSN Feb 27 #6