Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

reACTIONary

(7,100 posts)

8. I particularly like this observation:

Reply to demmiblue (Original post)

Thu Feb 26, 2026, 08:23 PM

Thursday

I particularly like this observation:

.... they have also threatened to designate us a “supply chain risk”—a label reserved for US adversaries, never before applied to an American company—and to invoke the Defense Production Act to force the safeguards’ removal. These latter two threats are inherently contradictory: one labels us a security risk; the other labels Claude as essential to national security.

Who knew an AI provider could spot a logical fallacy?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

ms liberty Lonestarblue

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

⚠️ Anthropic: "We cannot in good conscience accede" to the demands of the Department of War (* Defense) [View all] demmiblue Thursday OP

This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Thursday #1

Yes! Take a stand for the nation and sue the shit out of the regime for any retribution. pat_k Thursday #2

They have no choice. surrealAmerican Thursday #3

YES ❤️ YES ❤️ YES ❤️YES Tim S Thursday #4

If the Pentagon doesn't like it, then they should use a different vendor newdeal2 Thursday #5

Good! There'd been widespread condemnation of them loosening their core safety promise, as they highplainsdem Thursday #6

I like the announcement. They spelled "Defense" wrong, though. nt Gore1FL Thursday #7

They did not Layzeebeaver Thursday #10

I thought WmChris Thursday #12

Aha I get it!!! Layzeebeaver Yesterday #15

I particularly like this observation: reACTIONary Thursday #8

In war games A.I. has opted to use nuclear weapons 95% of the time. OGBuzz Thursday #9

Apparently, this AI hasn't reached the Joshua level yet frisbee7 Thursday #11

Shall we play a game? COL Mustard Thursday #13

I hope it never does. OGBuzz Thursday #14