Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

senseandsensibility

(24,719 posts)

4. It doesn't even have to be "dirty"

Reply to Scubamatt (Reply #2)

Thu Feb 26, 2026, 03:50 PM

Thursday

Just hard. For instance, I believe the Clintons easily could have gotten away with not testifying today unless it was public. And they should have stated that they were doing so because they didn't trust Rs to tell the truth about their testimony.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Scubamatt

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If the Democrats think voters will give them credit for demanding that Hillary testify [View all] senseandsensibility Thursday OP

I doubt "the Democrats" had anything to do with this leftstreet Thursday #1

I really wish our leadership could learn this lesson . . . Scubamatt Thursday #2

It doesn't even have to be "dirty" senseandsensibility Thursday #4

Good point Scubamatt Thursday #6

The idea was to expose the hypocrisy Johonny Thursday #3

Problem is senseandsensibility Thursday #5