Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Top Oversight Democrat says Merrick Garland should testify on Epstein [View all]
BannonsLiver
(20,398 posts)49. Interesting question.
Could be that. But I’ve always attributed it to naïveté or misplaced idealism of folks who haven’t changed with the times. People who don’t understand that the “my honorable friend across the aisle” era is dead and gone forever. They’re still fighting by the rules of the last war.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Top Oversight Democrat says Merrick Garland should testify on Epstein [View all]
Mr. Sparkle
7 hrs ago
OP
Great idea! And while they're at it, please subpoena whomever at SDNY requested NM to stop ranch investigation in 2019
SheltieLover
6 hrs ago
#3
Epstein-related files could not be legally released during Garland's term because Maxwell's case was still under appeal
bigtree
6 hrs ago
#11
There is certainly grounds for criticizing Garland for his slow prosecution of Trump, but not for this.
SunSeeker
5 hrs ago
#22
Those are not "rationalizations" about the handling of the Epstein files, they're facts.
SunSeeker
4 hrs ago
#39
When Bondi threw Garland's name at Ted Lieu he didn't disagree with her premise that Garland was delinquent on Epstein
BeyondGeography
4 hrs ago
#41
Exactly. Thank you bigtree. He didn't want to comment because it could endanger the conviction, which was on appeal.
SunSeeker
5 hrs ago
#16
I may have a different interpretation of 'still interviewing witnesses' than you
bigtree
5 hrs ago
#25
You can't show something that is missing -- like higher priority, greater emphasis, etc. I don't isolate everything to
KPN
3 hrs ago
#45
we're only talking about points and processes of law. What does 'proof' have to do with all that, you say?
bigtree
2 hrs ago
#48
We need to have a GOOD answer to this or it will cost us in the election. Currently our answer is that
Scrivener7
4 hrs ago
#35
Garland won't tell us anything. Bring on Jack Smith to talk about his investigations.
Scrivener7
4 hrs ago
#33
The deep of corruption in the current and former DOJ is very enlightening. Pretty obvious
walkingman
4 hrs ago
#36