Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rampartd

(4,460 posts)
9. epstein had an incinerator and 350 gals of H2SO4
Tue Feb 24, 2026, 04:22 PM
Tuesday

he had several boats and airplanes.

notice trump's sadistic fascination with sharks.

they should look, of course, but no one is "totally exonerated" if the bodies were "totally obliterated."

...........

where did i read 350 gals of sulphuric acid? he bought the stuff in 55 ga drums probably 6 drums 330 gal

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes. I can talk about decomposition too. But, does she know a damned thing about the terrain hlthe2b Tuesday #1
It's a click bait world leftstreet Tuesday #3
Hah! So true... hlthe2b Tuesday #4
It's not click bait. orangecrush Tuesday #6
Sorry leftstreet Tuesday #8
Thanks! orangecrush Tuesday #11
hey I am credited for some photos in a book Kali Tuesday #14
Anyone we would/should know?! hlthe2b Tuesday #16
sending a PM Kali Tuesday #17
Happy 22nd DU anniversary, Kali! True Dough Friday #18
Awww Kali Yesterday #19
Cadaver dogs SuzyandPuffpuff Tuesday #2
Murderers tend to be lazy, so they don't bury deep... Wounded Bear Tuesday #5
LIDAR and she does know what she's talking about. Blue Full Moon Tuesday #7
Thank you! orangecrush Tuesday #12
epstein had an incinerator and 350 gals of H2SO4 rampartd Tuesday #9
Well, they talked about it for so long before doing anything, Arlington Cemetery could have been Wonder Why Tuesday #10
My thoughts exactly. orangecrush Tuesday #13
7500 acres out here isn't a kingdom Kali Tuesday #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Zorro Ranch - If bodies w...»Reply #9