Given the recent pattern, its tough to ignore the pay-for-play appearances in an administration for which corruption allegations have become the norm.
The pattern of MAGA PAC donors getting what they want is striking, but Trumpâs Bridgegate is special:
- Jan 16: billionaire writes a check to Trump-aligned super PAC
- Feb 9: billionaire meets with Howard Lutnick
- Feb 9: Trump abandons his own position and says what the billionaire wanted to hear
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-02-23T17:03:23.547Z
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/why-a-generous-super-pac-donation-makes-trumps-bridgegate-look-even-worse
It was against this backdrop that the Times added a new installment to the series on Saturday:
Less than one month before meeting with a top administration official to lobby against a new bridge connecting Michigan with Canada, the billionaire owner of an existing bridge donated $1 million to a super PAC devoted to President Trump.
Matthew Moroun, a Detroit-based trucking magnate whose family has operated the Ambassador Bridge between Detroit and Windsor, Ontario, for decades, made the donation to MAGA Inc. on Jan. 16, according to a campaign finance report filed on Friday evening.
.....Initially, it wasnt at all clear what prompted Trumps declaration, r
ight up until we learned that a Michigan billionaire, Matthew Moroun, had met privately with administration officials, lobbying against the bridge. His motivation was obvious: Moroun owns a separate bridge that connects Michigan and Canada, and as former Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow of Michigan explained in a piece for MS NOW, he wants to maintain a near-monopoly with his single, privately owned toll bridge.
The Times latest reporting, however, made a bad story look worse. Consider a brief timeline:
Jan. 16: Moroun gives $1 million to MAGA Inc.
Feb. 9, midday: Moroun meets Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.
Feb. 9, evening: Trump abandons his own position and says what Moroun wanted to hear.
....But given the recent pattern,
its tough to ignore the pay-for-play appearances in an administration for which corruption allegations have become the norm