General Discussion

Last edited Mon Feb 23, 2026, 04:44 AM - Edit history (1)

But my research suggests there's many reasons to doubt that assertion. His work is generally very good, but I think he has a blind spot on the most critical point of fact here, I'll leave it at that. Everyone already hates me when I subvert the dominant paradigm around the Epstein conspiracy.

Suffice to say, I half-expect a follow-up article clarifying whether he made some assumptions he maybe shouldn't have, and/or that he's not as certain that Spreadsheet Tip IS the Jane Doe 4 case as what he seemed to convey. But I guess we'll see. Hopefully he spoke to Bloom's firm (who represented JD4) before publishing and they gave the okay and/or I'm just misreading his point.

But if I am, he's not being very clear what he's actually asserting.