General Discussion

senseandsensibility

(24,587 posts)

30. Who knows?

Reply to CTyankee (Reply #24)

Sun Feb 22, 2026, 08:10 PM

11 hrs ago

He'll probably have thirty different stories about that before 2028, each one crazier than the last.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Head to head poll between JD Vance and Newsom for 2028 is encouraging! [View all] senseandsensibility 17 hrs ago OP

Wow. SunSeeker 17 hrs ago #1

Have to admit that I was surprised senseandsensibility 17 hrs ago #2

Wow is right. Newsom/Moore would be the unbeatable dream ticket. PeaceWave 11 hrs ago #31

I haven't seen enough of Moore to make a judgement on him, but I do believe Jack Valentino 10 hrs ago #36

That poll shows there's still something very wrong with this country. mdbl 16 hrs ago #3

Even as a stalking horse, Newsom can drive Vance's poll numbers down farther Brother Buzz 16 hrs ago #4

Newsom is a bit of lightning rod, so not surprising Wanderlust988 16 hrs ago #5

What negative sh*t? Dave says 13 hrs ago #20

"A LOT of baggage?" Are you seriously bringing up that ridiculous shit from 21 years ago? PeaceWave 11 hrs ago #26

Any politician with a record will have a lot of things vulnerable to attack-- I do worry that Jack Valentino 10 hrs ago #38

. Scrivener7 11 hrs ago #32

Neither will be the 2028 nominee of their party. Nt Fiendish Thingy 16 hrs ago #6

So you won't be voting for Newsom in the Canadian primary? BannonsLiver 14 hrs ago #12

Nice... PeaceWave 11 hrs ago #27

HAHAHAHAHAHA! And VANCE will CERTAINLY LOSE the Canadian GOP primary--- Jack Valentino 10 hrs ago #39

JD Vance so oozes insincerity & unctuous "love" for all things Trump-MAGA (for the moment)... hlthe2b 16 hrs ago #7

Exactly! senseandsensibility 16 hrs ago #8

People do NOT like JD Vance pinkstarburst 16 hrs ago #9

Post removed Post removed 15 hrs ago #10

Newsom is not perfect but I'd vote for him over trump or jd senseandsensibility 14 hrs ago #11

Same Blue Full Moon 14 hrs ago #13

and twice on Tuesdays! Jack Valentino 10 hrs ago #40

so backing pritzker or the vanity candidate in CA is a no vote? nt msongs 13 hrs ago #15

Pritzker is for taxing billionaires. Blue Full Moon 13 hrs ago #17

Pritzker could be a good candidate, too Dave says 13 hrs ago #21

Who else do we have, really? Esp. since we evidently can't have a woman president.... CTyankee 14 hrs ago #14

Exactly pinkstarburst 13 hrs ago #16

Murphy is not flashy, didn't go to Yale, smart and knows what he's doing. I like him a LOT! CTyankee 13 hrs ago #19

He is very impressive and was out there almost immediately senseandsensibility 12 hrs ago #23

We still don't know if Trump is going to try to pull off running again. Or has he given that up? CTyankee 12 hrs ago #24

Who knows? senseandsensibility 11 hrs ago #30

especially with most other Democratic leaders Jack Valentino 9 hrs ago #42

Mark Kelly, Pritzger, Waltz, AOC Blue Full Moon 13 hrs ago #18

It's Prtizker and Walz. BannonsLiver 12 hrs ago #22

This message was self-deleted by its author WarGamer 11 hrs ago #25

Actually Harris is definitely in the hunt WarGamer 11 hrs ago #28

Love her, but I think that would be a mistake on our part. Scrivener7 11 hrs ago #34

It would definitely be a mistake, if she continues to speak with the "caution" Jack Valentino 9 hrs ago #43

I just don't think she's right for this moment, even if she does what you say. Scrivener7 4 min ago #44

Murphy would be my first choice. He's one of the organizers of the People's State of the Union. Scrivener7 11 hrs ago #33

It's my hope angrychair 11 hrs ago #29

"That poll shows there's still something very wrong with this country." J_William_Ryan 10 hrs ago #35

Except he won't do the thing that is needed. Always Blue 10 hrs ago #37

People completely (and perhaps purposely) misquote Newsom on this issue... PeaceWave 9 hrs ago #41

Well said. But my opinion is that, if taxing them means they'll move out of my state, we should tax them hard. Scrivener7 1 min ago #45