Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Did James Van Der Beek Really Die Broke? [View all]
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/james-van-der-beek-financial-struggles-gofundme-1236510777/Did James Van Der Beek Really Die Broke?
Hollywood has rallied behind the late 'Dawsons Creek' star, raising $2.6 million for his widow and six children. But the internet has been less generous, with scores of posters wondering why such a famous actor would need a fundraiser in the first plac
Steven Spielberg wrote a check for $25,000. Zoe Saldaña pledged $2,500 a month. Jon M. Chu gave $10,000, Norman Lears widow, Lyn, chipped in $5,000, while a slew of others TV writer Julie Plec, talk show host Ricki Lake, model Lydia Hearst signed up for thousands more.
In total, the GoFundMe launched to help James Van Der Beeks widow and six children so far has collected more than $2.6 million tangible, dollar-and-cents proof of how much the Dawsons Creek star was valued in Hollywood and how genuinely shaken the town was when, on Feb. 11, at just 48, he lost his three-year battle with colorectal cancer.
But, of course, no good deed goes unscrutinized, and those donations have been raising some prickly questions, especially online, where not everyone has been feeling so generous about Van Der Beeks GoFundMe campaign. Scores of posters have been wondering out loud why the family of such a famous actor the star not only of a seminal millennial teen drama that ran on The WB for six seasons but of a string of later TV projects and films would require an online fund-raiser.
----
Maybe. But Van Der Beek, for all his widespread name recognition, was not a super-high-net-worth celebrity or at least he didnt spend super conspicuously. ...... Until shortly before his death, he was renting the 36-acre ranch outside Austin, where he moved in 2020 and where he spent his final days among his family and friends, along with a small menagerie of horses, dogs and chickens. Whatever money he made through his decades onscreen and from what can be pieced together from interviews and industry realities, it probably wasnt a huge amount got sucked up by the costly business of battling cancer,
------
There was no residual money, Van Der Beek bluntly told an interviewer in 2014. I was 20. It was a bad contract.
---
But raising six kids, even in Austin, is expensive, and the rent on that 36-acre ranch which before Van Der Beeks arrival was sometimes leased out as a wedding venue wasnt cheap either (comparable properties in the area can go from $10,000 to $30,000 a month). Reports that Van Der Beek had purchased the place just before his death for $4.8 million turned out to be only half true. Reps for the actor told People that James secured [a] down payment for the Texas ranch for the family with the help of friends through a trust so they could shift from rent to mortgage.
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies