Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

onenote

(46,090 posts)

9. What do you think the odds are that a court enjoins the tariffs and the SCOTUS let's the inunction stand?

Reply to LetMyPeopleVote (Reply #8)

Sat Feb 21, 2026, 04:36 PM

21 hrs ago

They only are in effect for 150 days. If a court doesn't grant a preliminary injunction, the clock could run out before a final decision on their legality.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump says he'll enact a 10% global tariff by executive order [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Friday OP

Oh, I get it.................... MyOwnPeace Friday #1

Ha. SCrOTUS tries to save MAGATS from midterm calamity BUT B.See Friday #2

Checks and balances.... GONE FalloutShelter Friday #3

Make it 50%. That ought to teach them dalton99a Friday #4

Invoking the statutory "balance of payments" tariff authority has a good chance of surviving legal challenge onenote Friday #5

There is a difference between balance of payments deficit and a trade deficit LetMyPeopleVote 23 hrs ago #7

Neal Katyal does not think that Section 122 works LetMyPeopleVote 23 hrs ago #8

What do you think the odds are that a court enjoins the tariffs and the SCOTUS let's the inunction stand? onenote 21 hrs ago #9

Why Trump's Section 122 Tariffs Are Illegal LetMyPeopleVote 23 hrs ago #6