Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

peggysue2

(12,467 posts)

24. My question then: why did the esteemed right-side of the Court . . .

Reply to bigtree (Original post)

Sat Feb 21, 2026, 12:45 PM

21 hrs ago

Give this asshole immunity for anything related to Presidential duties? A decision that Trump has abused at every turn. And why did it take 10 months to rein this jerk in while the American economy, once the envy of the world, slipped into the ditch?

Where does the Constitution in Gorsuch's opinion and praise of constitutional language and restrictive notes on Executive power figure into that decision?

The liberal Justices are inconsistent? Pule-e-ese!

This was, however, the right decision. This time.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

bigtree

25 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did Gorsuch just signal intent to defend congressional power and authority in future rulings? [View all] bigtree Friday OP

I can hardly believe it, but UpInArms Friday #1

He certainly gave a history lesson. Buckeyeblue Friday #5

reminding of the history of a king imposing taxes without representation bigtree Friday #21

One can hope Tim S Friday #2

amen bigtree Friday #19

DURec leftstreet Friday #3

nah. they're just trying to save B.See Friday #4

there is a strong element of saving their own financial portfolios here bigtree Friday #8

So, seems they know how to reference B.See Friday #11

there were sly exploitations of relatively recent conservative doctrine by some of the majority bigtree Friday #20

Armies of masked thugs deporting our best customers are bad for business Bluetus Friday #6

Nope. Just says he values his wallet more than loyalty to Trump Raven123 Friday #7

I agree with that bigtree Friday #9

The problem is Gorsuch was one who agreed on the Trump immunity decision Raven123 Friday #13

I get that bigtree Friday #15

Or he's renegotiating lame54 Friday #10

Only when big money is at stake. 617Blue Friday #12

I agree on that bigtree Friday #16

K&R UTUSN Friday #14

Sadly the process also makes it very difficult to correct unintended consequences. dickthegrouch Friday #17

Gorsuch addressed that, I think, by pointing to the 'major questions doctrine' bigtree Friday #18

'btw' bigtree 22 hrs ago #22

It appears that 2 of the 3 TACO picks are THINKING on their butts! ProudMNDemocrat 22 hrs ago #23

My question then: why did the esteemed right-side of the Court . . . peggysue2 21 hrs ago #24

it's the old adage, I think, about who's ox is gored bigtree 20 hrs ago #25