Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DJ Synikus Makisimus

(1,309 posts)
3. Greater wealth for the few outweighs the needs of the many.
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 07:45 PM
9 hrs ago

The official poverty rate for an individual, it says here on Google, is $15,650. Try living on that. Raising it would require adjustments to all sorts of social programs (including but not limited to Social Security), which would skew the budget. That is to say, it COULD very well impact military spending and interest payments on the debt, both of which benefit the wealthiest Americans bigly. Other budget items giving welfare to the rich could also be affected. That could affect the percentage return on investment that the wealthiest Americans receive by ENTIRE percentage points. Monies accruing to HUNDREDS could be less than projected! That can't happen in our system. We're a nation of individualists, after all, and we don't need no stinkin' government. The rich are rich because of their hard work and smarts, right? Those people are better than the rest of us, and God shines on them. People like Trump.

The American voting public has been conditioned by years of bogus propaganda to think that taxation is the worst thing ever. People like Trump are seen by his supporters as "heroic" for not paying taxes. They see the IRS as evil and the income tax as unconstitutional. By most measures, Americans pay a good deal less tax than their counterparts in other developed nations. We get we they pay for - comparatively little. Reagan's privatization has seen to it that ever-greater percentages of other categories of government spending go to the wealthy as well. Trump boasts at the number of jobs he cuts from the government payroll. They get replaced by lower paid workers working for some rich guy or corporation that pockets the difference. One might call it "trickle-up economics," but it's a bit more than a trickle.

Democrats could do a better job at what good taxation could do, just like they could have opposed privatization, but they seem to all be afraid of losing the propaganda battle that would ensure and the next election as result. They probably would, since they're so lousy at "messaging." Thus, all two parties avoid tax increases like the plague. Politicians greatest fears seem to be to tax the wealthy or close their tax dodges. Notice, if you wish, the reaction to the DSA and WFP on this very site. It's not just Republicans. Funny that the regressive (affecting the poor more than the rich) sales tax and increases thereto aren't seen as being anywhere near as terrible as a progressive (the better-off pay more because they've benefited from the system) income tax. It shows how well far-right economic propaganda has penetrated the citizenry,

You may consider the following if you don't share the mainstream view and want the wealthy to pay a greater share:
https://www.dsausa.org
https://workingfamilies.org

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why doesn't a single poli...»Reply #3