General Discussion

Cirsium

(3,731 posts)

47. Why post at all?

Reply to QueerDuck (Reply #45)

Thu Feb 19, 2026, 08:44 PM

Thursday

Why post at all if you aren't serious?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Scrivener7 Emile

74 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What happened with AOC in Munich? I see no discussion on here but a lot of bashing on social media. [View all] Wanderlust988 Thursday OP

AOC did a great job...the usual anti-progressive forces are focusing on a few little flubs Prairie Gates Thursday #1

Senator or President Renew Deal Thursday #7

Pass. This is just wishful thinking for anyone to think she could ever be nominated... QueerDuck Thursday #10

Ending the electoral college is an even bigger fantasy. BannonsLiver Thursday #15

LOL! Neither one is going to happen. QueerDuck Thursday #17

Everything is "unrealistic" Cirsium Thursday #27

Winning is more important that pursuing pipe-dreams. This is a pipe-dream. QueerDuck Thursday #31

Winning what? Cirsium Thursday #42

If you need to ask then there's no point in... QueerDuck Thursday #45

Why post at all? Cirsium Thursday #47

It's a mistake to interpret my unwillingness to play games with you... QueerDuck Friday #62

I'm not sure why you think we should trust your declarations and dismissiveness Ilikepurple Thursday #38

You'll just have to wait and see. Bookmark this thread and come back... QueerDuck Thursday #44

Her getting elected 2 years from now is more likely than eliminating the electoral college Renew Deal Thursday #20

Neither is going to happen. Ever. QueerDuck Thursday #25

We're supposed to be serious and as part of that our priority is eliminating the Electoral College? Renew Deal Thursday #18

Here... please refer to post 17 above. QueerDuck Thursday #24

This sounds like the kind of thing people said about President Obama. A Clearing Friday #60

Sorry, the comparison to Obama is historically inaccurate. QueerDuck Friday #69

I don't disagree with any of that. A Clearing 17 hrs ago #72

Rebecca Solnit has a good take on it. Reader Rabbit Thursday #2

From what I've seen, she stammered a bit while collecting her thoughts, questionseverything Thursday #3

Obama was in a league of his own. PeaceWave Thursday #46

The comment on Venezuela being south of the equator Melon 14 hrs ago #74

She took a minute to think about what she was gonna say before she said it Walleye Thursday #4

It's all over Greg_In_SF Thursday #5

Yup. Just go to YouTube and search for AOC Munich. PeaceWave Thursday #28

I think she froze. n/t Wanderlust988 Thursday #33

Froze? Really? Scrivener7 Thursday #34

Froze? Cirsium Friday #52

She handled it well Renew Deal Thursday #39

If not ignored, it becomes a learning opportunity... PeaceWave Thursday #40

Don't know how many did or would see it Renew Deal Thursday #41

It was a gotcha Cirsium Friday #53

Post again when you find out leftstreet Thursday #6

I bet they're very concerned. Scrivener7 Thursday #32

soooooo concerned Skittles Friday #54

It's hard to imagine it's anything important JBTaurus83 Thursday #8

Today he forgot what country he appointed know-nothing Herschel Walker ambassador to Prairie Gates Thursday #9

I'm fairly sure Walker doesn't know, either susanr516 Thursday #19

She made some brilliant comments about how growing income inequality destabilizes democracies Fiendish Thingy Thursday #11

I know in the "establishment" JBTaurus83 Thursday #14

The US has long had a general commitment to Taiwan's defense Fiendish Thingy Thursday #22

I think the issue is that she's not just ANY member of Congress... PeaceWave Thursday #23

What do then believe the issue is? Torchlight Thursday #29

Particularly considering the long held "strategic ambiguity" policy. Jedi Guy Thursday #35

Definitely valid points JBTaurus83 Thursday #36

Please don't lump AOC with foreign policy stalwarts like Sen. Whitehouse, etc. Wanderlust988 Thursday #49

You just hedged in your own answer Fiendish Thingy Friday #50

My point was she could've dodged the question, but she couldn't even think on the spot. Wanderlust988 Friday #59

It's a layup Renew Deal Friday #63

It is a hard question JBTaurus83 Friday #57

True, but they should have that answer *now*, whatever it is they want to say Ursus Rex Friday #70

She is awesome! RoseTrellis Friday #65

But would any elected politician articulate the US policy as clearly and bluntly as you just did? Fiendish Thingy Friday #71

Looks like they're doing the same thing to her that they did to Hillary and Kamala. W_HAMILTON Thursday #12

It happened. It's not that big a deal. PeaceWave Thursday #13

What happened? Torchlight Thursday #21

She said "um" a few times. But, I mean, she wasn't wearing a tan suit or anything like that. Scrivener7 Thursday #30

Nothing ever happens. ;-) Seeking Serenity Thursday #43

LOL Skittles Friday #55

Maybe Jake Tapper SocialDemocrat61 Thursday #16

She looked incredibly presidential and people loved her SSJVegeta Thursday #26

Post removed Post removed Thursday #37

WTF? Scrivener7 Thursday #48

Perhaps you could refresh your acquaintance with DU's TOS. niyad Friday #58

Really nothing. RandySF Friday #51

here ya go, since you can't seem to find info yourself Skittles Friday #56

Right-wing nothing-scandal. She's the Democratic pick, thumb on scale, for next president, they insist. betsuni Friday #61

If she runs, she will be a major force Renew Deal Friday #64

This message was self-deleted by its author Nixie 15 hrs ago #73

AOC does not "make gaffes" Autumn Friday #66

I wondered the same thing. themaguffin Friday #67

What happened was a group of inferior men wrote some word salad critiques Quiet Em Friday #68