Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DJ Synikus Makisimus

(1,309 posts)
5. This is probably about alleged victims suing Hefner's estate, timed to coincide
Tue Feb 17, 2026, 10:46 PM
Tuesday

with the feeding frenzy surrounding the Epstein files. America never could handle sex in general, especially when linked to scandal and hyped by the media into spectacle, so especially not now. Thus the timing may prove beneficial to the plaintiffs. While child porn did not become illegal in the USA until 1978 (hence, I think, the reference to "the sixties" above), statutory rape was a thing for pretty much all Hef's life, in most states anyway.

Now me, I wonder whether releasing Epstein's files will be seen by some judges as "unfairly prejudicial" to defendants in future Epstein-related lawsuits, and perhaps even have a spill-over effect into other, unrelated matters. My suspicious mind also wonders if that IS the purpose of the current Khanna/Massie push. I also wonder: what the Biden Justice Department was doing for four years? Did they gather some/most/all of this stuff, or does some/most/all of it predate them, since Epstein died during Trump 1.0? No idea, me. But I wonder what the backstory is here; while at the same time doubting we'll ever get it.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hugh Hefner's widow warns...»Reply #5