Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We CANNOT, we MUST NOT, go back to the pre-Trump days [View all]Initech
(108,211 posts)12. No we do not.
Because no way in hell will our billionaire overlords let us get control of it. It would take a war or two for this to happen, and nobody wants that. Our constitution isn't perfect but it's the best we got and our best defense against the Fox News MAGA Taliban.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Pay for it anyway. Don't let Trump anywhere near its construction. These people
travelingthrulife
Wednesday
#92
And undo the tax cuts for everyone over $400K family income and businesses as well from that era
JT45242
Wednesday
#88
Presidential Pardons MUST Be Severely Limited and Carefully Monitored and
The Roux Comes First
Tuesday
#3
NONE of the items on your list can happen without court expansion and killing the filibuster
Fiendish Thingy
Tuesday
#6
If the court is expanded, is the assumption that they are all democratic justices?
Melon
Tuesday
#68
If Dems have the trifecta, they just pass a law increasing the number of seats
Fiendish Thingy
Tuesday
#72
Presidential pardons must be revised to disallow letting drug lords be allowed free for a fee.
Escurumbele
Tuesday
#9
Agreed. The current one has been riddled with system exploits and can't be fixed in a piecemeal fashion.
Efilroft Sul
Tuesday
#29
I don't give a shit what Scalia said, despite him having a heavy hand in getting us to where we are now.
Efilroft Sul
Tuesday
#54
No one needs a second billion. Tax the rich. And they like the 50s so much? The highest
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#25
Love this. I would add, legally enshrine women's rights to make their own medical decisions.
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#27
Add to that a crash program to reduce CO2 emissions. And use the full force of the antitrust laws
flashman13
Tuesday
#31
Please excuse this major oversight. We must complete the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment.
flashman13
Tuesday
#44
Social Media, the misinformation accelerant, needs to be regulated for accountability
Tim S
Tuesday
#45
I remenber the DOJ employees applauded him when he arrived on his first day....
AZ8theist
Wednesday
#79
IIRC - Garland was Orrin Hatch's approved SC choice given to Obama for 'bipartisanship'.
rubbersole
Wednesday
#82
At the top of the list Day 1: Restore bodily autonomy to 50% of the voters, the women of the US
camartinwv
Wednesday
#85
Yup. All of these " Wink, wink. Nudge, Nudge" good old boys rules need teeth.
travelingthrulife
Wednesday
#91
Begin by charging and convicting ANYONE who breaks our laws--including congress people, presidents, billionaires.
C Moon
Wednesday
#98
I agree with you, but before most things on your list can actually be done...
Ol Janx Spirit
Wednesday
#100