Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It is not an act of loyalty to quash conversations about our own party's role in getting to where we are today. [View all]EarlG
(23,720 posts)84. The posting rules are the same everywhere on DU
But remember, for the most part you all are the ones responsible for enforcing those rules. Thats why The Way Forward forum provides a reminder that there is an awful lot of wiggle room between bashing and constructive criticism and people are going to have different ideas on where those lines should be drawn. It also provides a common sense reminder about how to avoid getting posts removed.
This is the Statement of Purpose for The Way Forward forum:
Discuss the future of the Democratic Party and the left, strategies to rebuild the party's influence and reach, and tactics to retake political power from the right. REMINDER: Forum Hosts are only responsible for locking off-topic discussions in this forum, they are not responsible for locking discussions which may violate the DU rules. Please be aware that while the rules prohibit "bashing" of Democratic public figures, the rules also allow for constructive criticism. Between those two positions lies a large grey area, and if you want to avoid getting posts removed by Jury in this forum, remember that not everyone on DU may have the same appreciation or dislike for the same politicians that you do. If you treat your fellow DU members with respect and try to post in a civil manner, you will rarely have any problems. Posting derogatory nicknames for center-to-left politicians, groups of DU members, or individual DU members, will increase your chances of getting a post removed.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=about&forum=1324
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
16 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
248 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is not an act of loyalty to quash conversations about our own party's role in getting to where we are today. [View all]
Scrivener7
Feb 2026
OP
Sorry, it's not the Democratic Party. It's Republican voters, third party voters, and petulant nonvoters
lapucelle
Feb 2026
#3
And maga-pub IS NOT a political party---- it is a criminal domestic terrorist organization
Jack Valentino
Feb 2026
#207
I think we here all work hard to elect Democrats. And we have been doing so for years. And yet, here we are.
Scrivener7
Feb 2026
#48
Work harder to shut down opposition narratives, most especially those from purists and punishers
lapucelle
Feb 2026
#52
Which, by definition, has nothing to do with shutting down discussions on DU.
Scrivener7
Feb 2026
#53
To begin with, expressing an opinion on a topic is not "shutting down discussion" on a topic.
lapucelle
Feb 2026
#66
Even given the definitional problems (and notwithstanding the random use of latin),
lapucelle
Feb 2026
#127
Recognizing a Latin word and saying your conclusion doesn't follow from your premises is not an argument either
Ilikepurple
Feb 2026
#198
Creating your own three term argument by merging two distinct and seperate terms into one
lapucelle
Feb 2026
#221
You said even given the definitional problems, there conclusion does not follow
Ilikepurple
Feb 2026
#236
You merged two terms into one in an attempt to create a syllogism where none exists.
lapucelle
Feb 2026
#239
I agree with you 100% Scrivener7. It is not a fluke that we are in this mess.
flashman13
Feb 2026
#71
I'm really looking forward to the primaries too. We have an incredible bench, and
Scrivener7
Feb 2026
#73
It's the Democratic Party which nominates candidates which voters either accept or reject
Jose Garcia
Feb 2026
#154
With the (somewhat) arguable exception of 2024, voters choose the candidates.
lapucelle
Feb 2026
#165
Same here. And I'm highly suspect of the motives of anyone demanding we do otherwise.
FoxNewsSucks
Feb 2026
#67
Yep. And that's the problem. This has nothing to do with criticizing Democrats. It has to do with looking at
Scrivener7
Feb 2026
#8
I'm with you right up until the part about nominating a republican. But I get your point.
Scrivener7
Feb 2026
#22
While I'm grateful to Conservatives who have drawn a line and chosen to
MadameButterfly
Feb 2026
#62
If we don't look at the issues of the Dem structure, and question it, then we are in a cult...
yellow dahlia
Feb 2026
#81
"I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever
Ping Tung
Feb 2026
#11
"I am a Christian and a Democrat. That's all": FDR, when asked to define his political philosophy.
lapucelle
Feb 2026
#21
Yes, folks choose to vote for Republicans or third-party candidates or to withhold any vote as punishment
lapucelle
Feb 2026
#120
Just as there's nothing wrong calling out the politicians who support or vote for
Ping Tung
Feb 2026
#143
I'm not talking about ripping on Dems and I'm not talking about anything that violates the TOS.
Scrivener7
Feb 2026
#13
Fire the strategists and consultant class, The party needs to stop making the same mistakes.
yellow dahlia
Feb 2026
#86
Any time we stop speaking truth, we benefit those who want to hide the truth.
hamsterjill
Feb 2026
#14
Cheerleaders, the party is always right, swarm, posse, toe the line, echo chamber, blind loyalty, marching in lockstep,
betsuni
Feb 2026
#17
Finding out facts instead of leaping to negative conclusions about Democrats is mocked as mindless loyalty. Projection.
betsuni
Feb 2026
#164
We failed to read history, but it's only now that history is understood at all
bucolic_frolic
Feb 2026
#18
So much yes to this! All those bad movies about evil conglomerates trying to rule the world?
Scrivener7
Feb 2026
#29
My daughter quipped the other day - "Who knew the original Superman movie was a road map..."
harumph
Feb 2026
#42
Trump 2.0 could have been prevented by closing the border and having a normal primary
dalton99a
Feb 2026
#31
In his diplomatic, inoffensive way, I think President Obama pointed the way
Martin Eden
Feb 2026
#35
I think that's a perfect example because it's my opinion that, if Democratic leaders had not gotten so much
Scrivener7
Feb 2026
#44
So a groundswell of constituent opinion has no effect on your elected officials?
Scrivener7
Feb 2026
#134
Social media posts and constituent opinion are two very different things. N/T
lapucelle
Feb 2026
#167
i completely agree with you. We should be able to speak freely if it is for constructive reason
samsingh
Feb 2026
#51
So the lesson, which I hope we have learned, is that we release it all as soon as we are able.
Scrivener7
Feb 2026
#122
100% Agree, Scrivener 7. If we can't see our own part in something we can't improve...
johnnyplankton
Feb 2026
#55
I do think the DNC is starting to realize that much of the grass roots is really pissed at the party leadership
Bluetus
Feb 2026
#83
I think recent events have provided us with a pretty extensive list of things we
Scrivener7
Feb 2026
#85
There was one in particular this morning that was a good example. I can't link to it. For reasons I will not state.
Scrivener7
Feb 2026
#107
Milquetoast, strongly worded letters, old guard, status quo, gerontocracy, Vichy Dems, Surrender Dems,
betsuni
Feb 2026
#124
Good post Scrivener7, and a worthwhile question to ask. I feel the biggest mistake we may have made is to underestimate
c-rational
Feb 2026
#101
It's not possible currently to discuss mistakes and we are doomed to repeat them again.
Melon
Feb 2026
#152
This and your gatekeeping is the issue that prevents open discussion and improvement.
Melon
Feb 2026
#177
It has nothing to do with being loyal. It's about fighting back against (often) unfair and unwarranted criticism.
W_HAMILTON
Feb 2026
#153
I wasn't defending Garland (especially towards the end) nor was I backstabbing Hillary and Kamala.
W_HAMILTON
Feb 2026
#241
I may be late to this discussion, but I read it early this morning and just now thought I would add my 2cents.
Ninga
Feb 2026
#155
And they feel just as strongly as you do about their name calling being calling it as they see it
EdmondDantes_
Feb 2026
#205
The key: 100% confidence one is 100% correct, obviously morally righteously correct.
betsuni
Feb 2026
#212
The number of RECs, replies, and views to this OP shows just how important to the DU community...
Ol Janx Spirit
Feb 2026
#197