Libertarians warned about the 'imperial presidency.' Too few actually warned about Trump. [View all]
https://www.ms.now/opinion/libertarians-warned-trump-told-you-so-executive-power
When I saw the headline Libertarians Tried to Warn You About Trump atop a New York Times op-ed last Monday, I thought, Hmmm, thats not quite how I remember it. Adorned with the striking image of the Gadsden flags Dont Tread on Me snake about to get curb-stomped by an enormous black jackboot, the piece was written by Katherine Mangu-Ward, editor in chief of the libertarian magazine and website Reason where I worked as a journalist for roughly six years. (I left shortly after President Donald Trumps first inauguration.)
Sure enough, upon reading the column, I discovered the headline didnt accurately reflect Mangu-Wards argument. She primarily made the case that libertarians have warned for years under presidents in both major parties about the dangers of ever-expanding executive authority, whats been aptly coined the Imperial Presidency. Rather than claiming to have specifically warned about Trump, the writer boasted that libertarians had long sounded the alarm over the consolidation of such power power now being used for nefarious purposes by a president who just happens to be Donald Trump. (The Times later that day amended the headline to the less specific but more honest, Libertarians: We Told You So.)
I cant argue with that. To the extent most self-identified professional libertarians warned about Trump, they warned about the awesome powers that could be abused by a generic authoritarian president from either party.
But Trump is not a hypothetical. He always told us who he was. And there are far fewer of us who took (and continue to hold) the comparatively unpopular view among libertarians and other right-of-center fellow travelers that Trump presented as a uniquely authoritarian, vindictive, racist, corrupt and lawless demagogue of which there isnt remotely an analog on the other side of the aisle.
*snip*