Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZJonnie

(3,382 posts)
22. Why must you insist it's a delusional tangent
Sun Feb 15, 2026, 06:42 PM
Sunday

when you don't know what my prompt actually was?

AI needs to be used judiciously in helping one write code. It is EXTREMELY useful in the hands of an experienced coder who really takes their time and writes good prompts. The fact that many people are going to "use it wrong" and expect AI to read their freaking mind, or don't know how to properly construct prompts, is arguably not a problem with AI itself, as such.

I would argue the biggest problem is the fuckhead AI companies paying off the pols so they can rush to market before there's ANY protective standards for humanity. If we just MANAGED the shit well, it could really be a "damn good thing".

One thing I hope you get from me is that I may seem to 'stick up' for AI, I'm mostly sticking up for the tech itself, which is pretty damn amazing, objectively, despite your dissent on that thought. But I am generally NOT on the side of these companies that made it, how they did it, nor how they've rolled it out.

If you see me cheering for the companies, please do call me out, sestra

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thx to you & Goonch SheltieLover Feb 13 #1
Lol for fun I asked an AI the reason for the discrepancy and gave it the passage from your post AZJonnie Feb 13 #2
Not sure what you mean. It quoted one of my replies in that Science Fiction thread, or it quoted highplainsdem Feb 13 #4
I mean it literally sourced from this very thread AZJonnie Feb 13 #7
Claude is clueless. There is an actual story. I posted links about it in the earlier thread I linked to. There highplainsdem Feb 13 #9
It's not surprising that it got confused, this entire discussion is extremely circular AZJonnie Feb 13 #13
I would've expected any bot to at least follow the links in both threads, which would have shown that highplainsdem Feb 13 #15
Claude would have seen this bit, in Goonch's follow-up, which said this: AZJonnie Feb 13 #17
Interesting seeing you try to defend Claude's inane answer, when this thread links to the older thread highplainsdem Sunday #19
I guess I am, given you don't know what the actual prompt was, yet are arbitrarily coming up with a strawman AZJonnie Sunday #20
If there was anything close to intelligence in Claude, the highplainsdem Sunday #21
Why must you insist it's a delusional tangent AZJonnie Sunday #22
No, the problem using genAI is with genAI and its inherent flaws. Anyone who's ever used genAI should highplainsdem Monday #27
And, The Chatbot Is Still Wrong ProfessorGAC Feb 13 #3
+1. It's patent nonsense dalton99a Feb 13 #5
I don't know about that one, Professor :) AZJonnie Feb 13 #8
I'm Going To Say No ProfessorGAC Feb 13 #11
Obviously I know I don't know nearly as much on this topic as you do, so I generally defer, Sir :) AZJonnie Feb 13 #14
Pretty Much ProfessorGAC Feb 13 #16
Can you name a movie in which one person occupied two places at the same time? Orrex Monday #29
BTTF Is A Prime Example, Yes ProfessorGAC Monday #33
Right, but that's not the same Marty in two places at once Orrex Monday #34
Not Getting You ProfessorGAC Monday #35
I think we're differing on what qualifies as the "same" person Orrex Monday #37
Oh wait. I just caught your bit about "lack of matter available" Orrex Monday #38
These tools don't just fabricate fiction. They fabricate citations in law and science pieces. RockRaven Feb 13 #6
Yes. I mentioned that in the earlier thread I linked to. I've posted lots of warnings here over the last few years highplainsdem Feb 13 #10
+1. AI is essentially a smooth-talking buzzword-spewing bullshitter with an unlimited capacity for plagiarism dalton99a Feb 13 #12
Exactly. highplainsdem Sunday #18
When ChatGPT became popular, people said AI systems really need to provide sources. Renew Deal Sunday #24
Good catch Renew Deal Sunday #23
Thanks - but I wouldn't have caught it if I hadn't already looked at a number of websites about the story so highplainsdem Monday #25
Yikes. So how do we combat this? It's only going to get worse. Scrivener7 Monday #26
Yeah, it's getting scary. I posted something I didn't know was AI. I took it down as soon as mucifer Monday #28
It's really bad in the political commentary video space Renew Deal Monday #31
I suspect AI systems will be like fish farms. cachukis Monday #30
I miss the old Google. Hell, I miss the old Alta Vista. haele Monday #32
Anyone can make up a quote. GoCubsGo Monday #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You've probably heard tha...»Reply #22