Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Baitball Blogger

(51,983 posts)

7. The articles I have been reading this morning have made it sound like they only needed 51.

Reply to lamp_shade (Reply #3)

Sun Feb 15, 2026, 09:06 AM

Sunday

So, I am relieved to hear this from you.

It really does sound like even reliable sources are trying to create urgency to get readers to read their articles. I'm thankful to have DU as a source.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, who is watching the progress of the Save Act in the Senate? [View all] Baitball Blogger Sunday OP

She's not the deciding vote newdeal2 Sunday #1

When will this nightmare end? Baitball Blogger Sunday #2

A new liberal SCOTUS being installed? newdeal2 Sunday #4

I hear that as written, JD Vance would not be able to vote because Baitball Blogger Sunday #10

60 votes will be needed to pass senate. lamp_shade Sunday #3

The articles I have been reading this morning have made it sound like they only needed 51. Baitball Blogger Sunday #7

FYI - lamp_shade Sunday #11

SAVE rso Sunday #5

It should be called the Save Republicans Act yourout Sunday #6

Good observation. Baitball Blogger Sunday #8

Save Republicans ASS Act. nt Trueblue Texan Sunday #9

Like the one above yours, BUT i even like yours BETTER!! bluestarone Monday #13

Now apparently Thune is going to attach it to a "must-pass" bill not fooled Monday #12

. Baitball Blogger Monday #14

DOUBLE bluestarone Monday #15