Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You've probably heard that AI chatbots can completely fabricate quotes. It happened yesterday in a DU thread. [View all]highplainsdem
(61,109 posts)9. Claude is clueless. There is an actual story. I posted links about it in the earlier thread I linked to. There
are no fan-fiction versions of that story, AFAIK, and none of the searches I did for different sentences in that fake quote written by another chatbot turned up any results.
Claude completely invented a reason for what happened that had nothing to do with the reality I explained here.
The story itself is real. The other chatbot got the title and author right, and mentioned one of the books the story has been published in, but invented a fake ending.
I'd give Claude an F, but there really should be a grade Z for being so incredibly wrong.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You've probably heard that AI chatbots can completely fabricate quotes. It happened yesterday in a DU thread. [View all]
highplainsdem
Friday
OP
Lol for fun I asked an AI the reason for the discrepancy and gave it the passage from your post
AZJonnie
Friday
#2
Not sure what you mean. It quoted one of my replies in that Science Fiction thread, or it quoted
highplainsdem
Friday
#4
Claude is clueless. There is an actual story. I posted links about it in the earlier thread I linked to. There
highplainsdem
Friday
#9
It's not surprising that it got confused, this entire discussion is extremely circular
AZJonnie
Friday
#13
I would've expected any bot to at least follow the links in both threads, which would have shown that
highplainsdem
Friday
#15
Interesting seeing you try to defend Claude's inane answer, when this thread links to the older thread
highplainsdem
Sunday
#19
I guess I am, given you don't know what the actual prompt was, yet are arbitrarily coming up with a strawman
AZJonnie
Sunday
#20
No, the problem using genAI is with genAI and its inherent flaws. Anyone who's ever used genAI should
highplainsdem
Monday
#27
Obviously I know I don't know nearly as much on this topic as you do, so I generally defer, Sir :)
AZJonnie
Friday
#14
These tools don't just fabricate fiction. They fabricate citations in law and science pieces.
RockRaven
Friday
#6
Yes. I mentioned that in the earlier thread I linked to. I've posted lots of warnings here over the last few years
highplainsdem
Friday
#10
+1. AI is essentially a smooth-talking buzzword-spewing bullshitter with an unlimited capacity for plagiarism
dalton99a
Friday
#12
When ChatGPT became popular, people said AI systems really need to provide sources.
Renew Deal
Sunday
#24
Thanks - but I wouldn't have caught it if I hadn't already looked at a number of websites about the story so
highplainsdem
Monday
#25