Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ol Janx Spirit

(878 posts)
18. I agree. Impeachment--at this point in time--shouldn't even be considered for anything but the...
Thu Feb 12, 2026, 07:44 PM
Feb 12

...most egregious thing imaginable--something so obviously horrible that members of the sitting president's own party are calling for it. Otherwise it is just a waste of time and political capital--more likely to be used against the party bringing it than against the perpetrator of the high crimes and misdemeanors.

Republicans are certainly not calling for anything in this case, and it seems too easy for them to brush this off as not even really being part of his duties as president--so nothing to see here. I can easily see them saying that when it comes to Turnip the standard is that only things directly related to the running of the country are fair game--not merely construction projects he might want to pursue. Of course, their standard would be jaywalking for a Democrat, but we expect that hypocrisy--it doesn't change the vote count.

All of the energy the Democratic party expends should be spent pursuing getting public sentiment on the side of undoing the damage that conservatives have done to our democracy over the last several decades--including, but not limited to:
- Getting corporate and dark money out of politics
- Restoring a robust education system in the U.S.
- Getting religion out of the public square
- Restoring balance to the Supreme Court
- Ensuring elections are actually free and fair
- Bringing more voters to the polls so democracy truly has a powerful voice
- Codifying the norms we all took for granted before the era of the Orange Abomination

Drawn out and futile impeachment debates do not further those goals IMO.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think that is one of the things that terrifies Trump about a Dem majority Fiendish Thingy Feb 12 #1
Impeachment is soooo last century. progressoid Feb 12 #2
I get the sentiment angrychair Feb 12 #4
The problem is, the inbred MAGA drones LOVE the grift and corruption. Aristus Feb 12 #16
You are soooooo right. Tried it twice before. What makes anyone think the Senate would convict this time? Katinfl Feb 12 #5
I agree. Impeachment--at this point in time--shouldn't even be considered for anything but the... Ol Janx Spirit Feb 12 #18
"[O]n the grounds of national security" means THE BUNKER. ColoringFool Feb 12 #3
Not necessarily. It is just a phrase that is supposed to close down discussions. erronis Feb 12 #8
Rec. Very good points Evolve Dammit Feb 12 #6
What? Another one?? Fil1957 Feb 12 #7
Impeachment?! paleotn Feb 12 #9
I'll go out on a limb and rec n/t BaronChocula Feb 12 #17
It was illegal. regardless of all that. GoCubsGo Feb 12 #10
"Tearing down half the White House disguises another of my bribery slush funds" struggle4progress Feb 12 #11
And this will make what difference? n/t TygrBright Feb 12 #12
"but we illegally destroyed the bunker we use for national security!" eggplant Feb 12 #13
"on the grounds of NATIONAL SECURITY?"... GiqueCee Feb 12 #14
"An impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives...... Brother Buzz Feb 12 #15
Bombing Old Faithful in Yellowstone without Congressional approval would violate the Property Clause of the Constitution pat_k Feb 13 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New Impeachable Offense J...»Reply #18