Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,573 posts)
45. Deadline Legal Blog-Grand jury's refusal to indict Democrats joins a stunning pattern of DOJ rejections
Thu Feb 12, 2026, 10:18 AM
Feb 12

The decision to not approve charges against Democratic lawmakers was remarkable in its own right but is only the latest grand jury rejection in Trump’s second term.



https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/grand-jury-rejection-trump-doj-kelly-slotkin-dunn-lemon

The most important story of Donald Trump’s second term just might be one that has been unfolding quietly behind closed doors, as grand jurors have been rejecting some of his Justice Department’s most politicized charges, preventing them from even making it to trial.

So, while the rejection of charges against Democratic lawmakers on Tuesday was remarkable in its own right, it was only the latest data point in a stunning pattern that has emerged over the past year.

The Trump DOJ’s failure to secure an indictment in Washington against Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich.; Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz.; and others follows its failure to convince grand jurors in Virginia to revive charges against another Democrat, New York Attorney General Letitia James. Slotkin, Kelly and other Democratic lawmakers had released a video urging soldiers not to follow illegal orders, after which the Republican president accused them in a social media post of “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!”

Through their refusal to indict, the grand jurors in D.C. effectively said the senators’ actions shouldn’t be punishable at all.

Just as importantly, the grand jury rebuffs haven’t only come to the aid of prominent figures. Grand jurors also have stood up for everyday people whom the Trump DOJ has sought to charge with assaults on law enforcement officers carrying out his federal occupation in Washington, Chicago and Los Angeles. Think sandwich thrower Sean Dunn — or Sidney Reid, whom grand jurors refused to indict a whopping three times. In both Dunn’s case and Reid’s, prosecutors plowed forward to trial on misdemeanor charges — which didn’t require grand jury approval — and the D.C. trial juries returned not guilty verdicts....

Against that backdrop, it’s unremarkable that federal prosecutors could get an indictment against Lemon or anyone else they set their sights on. Grand jury presentations are typically the start of a case, not the end. Therefore, securing an indictment in a given case doesn’t say a whole lot about the case’s prospects, with trial juries still standing in the way of any prosecution that makes it that far, where the government needs to prove its case to everyday citizens beyond a reasonable doubt.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Maybe now the monster will stop targeting his enemies? vapor2 Feb 10 #1
It's just legal harassment! It usually costs money to defend against most charges--- Jack Valentino Feb 10 #14
Never. SergeStorms Feb 11 #39
Not really a surprise senseandsensibility Feb 10 #2
Huge - KABOOM, malaise Feb 10 #3
Illegal orders you mean. pwb Feb 10 #4
This UTUSN Feb 10 #23
They are not going to stop. johnnyfins Feb 10 #5
Correct they will keep trying newdeal2 Feb 10 #11
That's a relief MustLoveBeagles Feb 10 #6
Trump administration fails to secure indictment in connection with Democrats involved in 'illegal orders' video LetMyPeopleVote Feb 10 #7
Pirro: brakester Feb 11 #37
Ham sandwiches apparently have more criminal tendencies Ocelot II Feb 10 #8
Well Duh! What "crime" were they supposed to have committed according to the DOJ? Wiz Imp Feb 10 #9
According to the NYT, "interfering with the loyalty, morale or discipline of the U.S. armed forces" muriel_volestrangler Feb 11 #30
That is great news! mysteryowl Feb 10 #10
That's illegal orders not legal orders WmChris Feb 10 #12
This UTUSN Feb 10 #24
So Pirro decided to go ahead and make herself look like a drunk fool again mdbl Feb 10 #13
She Was Born to the Role The Roux Comes First Feb 10 #26
For a small period of time, it looked like she might try to rehab mdbl Feb 11 #32
the J6 king himself, whining about "seditious behavior" Skittles Feb 10 #15
Good on them canetoad Feb 10 #16
Old "Drinky" Jeanine's batting average keeps dropping. LudwigPastorius Feb 10 #17
Here's the video of Chris Hayes' announcement: Rhiannon12866 Feb 10 #18
Now sue them for 20 Billion dollars! BidenRocks Feb 10 #19
YES!!!!!! calimary Feb 10 #20
Hooray! mahina Feb 10 #21
OMG, we won ONE LilElf70 Feb 10 #22
Can the grand jury transcripts be made public? Tasmanian Devil Feb 10 #25
Mark Kelly is worth a thousand tRumps. Dave Bowman Feb 10 #27
Bondi will try again Mz Pip Feb 10 #28
Dont celebrate yet Smackdown2019 Feb 10 #29
At least he should be in a good mood next week............ n/t DFW Feb 11 #31
Grand Jury Rebuffs Justice Dept. Attempt to Indict 6 Democrats in Congress (NYT Gift Subscription) LetMyPeopleVote Feb 11 #33
Good Botany Feb 11 #34
Excellent! Fuck you Pete Hegseth! Initech Feb 11 #35
Refuse ILLEGAL Orders, not Legal MineralMan Feb 11 #36
Excellent! ShazzieB Feb 11 #38
Fix your post Mysterian Feb 11 #40
People over power. And ultimately, we the people KPN Feb 11 #41
MaddowBlog-Dems enraged after Trump's DOJ targeted veterans with charges of seditious conspiracy LetMyPeopleVote Feb 11 #42
I expected this, given the fact that the Uniform Code of Military Justice states this quite clearly. patphil Feb 11 #43
No grand jurors found the Trump DOJ met low probable cause threshold in failed indictment of Democratic lawmakers LetMyPeopleVote Feb 11 #44
Deadline Legal Blog-Grand jury's refusal to indict Democrats joins a stunning pattern of DOJ rejections LetMyPeopleVote Feb 12 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chris Hayes reporting tha...»Reply #45