Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hunter

(40,514 posts)
18. The "junior level" developers who prompt and review this code are just fall guys.
Thu Feb 12, 2026, 12:01 AM
Thursday

When this code fails catastrophically they'll be the ones blamed, not the idiots who thought this AI stuff was a good idea and invested heavily in it.

Potential computer science majors may be realizing they are setting themselves up for careers in the digital sweatshops -- sweat shops where they'll risk getting fired if they dare complain about the fancy new sewing machines the bosses bet the futures of their companies on.

I've had two jobs in the computer industry. One for a mainframe manufacturer that was sinking, where almost everyone had already cast off in the lifeboats, and one job writing 1802 assembly code, something that literally left me scarred for life because I was young and foolish and didn't have the good sense not to mix my personal life with whatever that income producing activity was. It was certainly not professional. That was back when Pascal was the hot new teaching language. I still have my silver user manual and report. That'll tell you how long ago that was. I first signed onto the internet in the late 'seventies, before there was a World Wide Web.

For the sake of my sanity I'm glad I didn't go down that path. It turned out I was much, much happier studying evolutionary biology. Nevertheless it's a rare day I'm not up to some mischief on my computers.

It's appalling that people in our nation have to fear for their futures as they grow older -- not just their comfort and dignity, but for their very survival.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Tyvm for clarifying! SheltieLover Wednesday #1
Yvw, Sheltie! highplainsdem Wednesday #5
😊👍 SheltieLover Wednesday #8
Thanks! Appreciate your effort in calling out some of the hyperbole , and attendant hubris. - - - - -(nt)- stopdiggin Wednesday #2
You're welcome! I should have done more checking and posted this earlier, but had a lot of other highplainsdem Wednesday #7
More on Matt Shumer here, starting with a Bluesky post from a journalist working for PC Gamer: highplainsdem Wednesday #3
i regularly correspond with Gary Marcus Metaphorical Wednesday #4
I've had some great exchanges with Gary, too. I'd have trusted him more than Matt Shumer in any highplainsdem Wednesday #10
I've brought this up before in your posts, but as a developer with 25 years experience, it really IS scary. FascismIsDeath Wednesday #6
this also ... A well thought, and absolutely solid 'take' on the overall picture. Thanks! stopdiggin Wednesday #11
I'm sorry that AI's coding ability is becoming such a threat to developers' jobs. But part of the reason highplainsdem Wednesday #12
The "junior level" developers who prompt and review this code are just fall guys. hunter Thursday #18
Pascal was the first language I really learned. FascismIsDeath Thursday #19
Thanks for putting this together. Good stuff. WhiskeyGrinder Wednesday #9
You're welcome! I wish I'd read about Shumer hours earlier. highplainsdem Wednesday #13
See reply 14. Shumer needed AI to write that crap. He's really AI-addled. highplainsdem Wednesday #15
Yeah it was clear from reading it. WhiskeyGrinder Wednesday #16
That twit Shumer needed AI to help him write that piece of weaponized hype (as Gary Marcus called it): highplainsdem Wednesday #14
Kick highplainsdem Wednesday #17
Yeah I clicked on it - and then realized it was just a AI glazefest. 617Blue Thursday #20
Reddit thread & YouTube video on why Shumer was accused of fraud in 2024: highplainsdem Thursday #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some reality about Matt S...»Reply #18