Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Wiz Imp

(9,508 posts)

10. I would guess most are searching for specific documents that were already identified in the redacted files

Reply to chowder66 (Reply #8)

Wed Feb 11, 2026, 07:40 PM

Feb 11

The point being Democrats want to find out what was redacted and prove that 99% of the redactions were illegal and unnecessary. I would bet most searches are for simple document numbers.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

love_katz chowder66

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Blondi is tracking Congress' searches in Epstein files [View all] deminks Feb 11 OP

Like knowing what they know. Kid Berwyn Feb 11 #1

Granted, but you know they'll F it up some how. paleotn Feb 11 #4

I didn't watch the whole thing TommyT139 Feb 11 #2

File charges for what? Wiz Imp Feb 11 #9

You'd think, right? TommyT139 Feb 11 #11

A congressman are suing for have phone records pulled lame54 Feb 11 #3

They want to know who they can try and blackmail into not letting people read it sakabatou Feb 11 #5

I asked on the other thread about this, is this legal? Arazi Feb 11 #6

Isn't that what the Repugs were claiming slightlv Feb 11 #7

One of two things and maybe both.... chowder66 Feb 11 #8

I would guess most are searching for specific documents that were already identified in the redacted files Wiz Imp Feb 11 #10

MaddowBlog-Justice Department accused of surveilling lawmakers' Epstein files search history LetMyPeopleVote Feb 12 #12