General Discussion

1) No apparent police report
2) No apparent sworn victim affidavit (which can be done anonymously)
3) No apparent known lawsuit from this alleged victim
4) Chasin does not appear to have either owned a plane, nor had a pilot's license
5) Chasin's name does not appear to be in any other Epstein document that's been released, and there's no obvious news article talking about them at the same place at the same time.
6) The actual email (that's all this is) does not appear to be publicly available, so all stories about this are based on "Politico's word about what they read"
7) If the Email contained any dates, other passengers on the plane, or explicit age of the victim, Politico didn't think to include them.
8) A prosecutor’s memo in the newly released Epstein files notes that Brad Edwards (lead counsel for the Epstein victims in the JPMorgan case) opposed adding one of Jeanne Christensen’s Leon Black clients to the $290 million JPMorgan settlement, telling prosecutors there was no corroboration for her claims about Epstein, Maxwell, and Black and calling the list of men she said she’d been trafficked to “incredible.”

As powerful as the words "young woman", "Epstein", and "sex with powerful men" are to our collective conscience, it might be wise to take this particular Politico article with a small grain of salt, in particular the characterization that "Chasin flew her to (Epsteins)".

Now we get to switch places from our earlier conversation vanessa, cause this time I ain't necessarily buying it