Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,573 posts)
7. Trump administration fails to secure indictment in connection with Democrats involved in 'illegal orders' video
Tue Feb 10, 2026, 08:47 PM
Feb 10

President Donald Trump had accused six Democratic lawmakers of "seditious behavior" after they urged members of the military and intelligence communities to refuse unlawful orders.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/doj-fails-secure-indictment-democrats-involved-illegal-orders-video-rcna258385

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration tried and failed on Tuesday to secure an indictment in connection with a video featuring six Democratic lawmakers urging members of the military and intelligence communities not to comply with unlawful orders, three sources familiar with the matter told NBC News.

It was not clear how many of the lawmakers the Trump administration attempted to indict, or if the failed attempt will be addressed in a future court hearing.

The indictment pursued by the office of U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro is the latest example of the Justice Department targeting the president’s perceived political opponents. The government attorneys assigned to the case are political appointees, not career Justice Department prosecutors, according to a source familiar with the investigation.....

In addition to the First Amendment issues, the “speech or debate" clause of the Constitution gives lawmakers on Capitol Hill immunity from prosecution for acts taken within the legislative sphere, a fundamental check on the constitutional separation of powers.

Several Democrats involved in the video recently said they would not cooperate with the Justice Department's probe into the video.

Under longstanding Justice Department policy, the Public Integrity Section would normally have to sign off on every step of an investigation into a sitting member of Congress, especially a case with free speech and speech and debate considerations. But the Trump administration has dismantled the Public Integrity Section, eliminating checks meant to prevent the Justice Department's powers from being abused for political purposes.

Recommendations

13 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Maybe now the monster will stop targeting his enemies? vapor2 Feb 10 #1
It's just legal harassment! It usually costs money to defend against most charges--- Jack Valentino Feb 10 #14
Never. SergeStorms Feb 11 #39
Not really a surprise senseandsensibility Feb 10 #2
Huge - KABOOM, malaise Feb 10 #3
Illegal orders you mean. pwb Feb 10 #4
This UTUSN Feb 10 #23
They are not going to stop. johnnyfins Feb 10 #5
Correct they will keep trying newdeal2 Feb 10 #11
That's a relief MustLoveBeagles Feb 10 #6
Trump administration fails to secure indictment in connection with Democrats involved in 'illegal orders' video LetMyPeopleVote Feb 10 #7
Pirro: brakester Feb 11 #37
Ham sandwiches apparently have more criminal tendencies Ocelot II Feb 10 #8
Well Duh! What "crime" were they supposed to have committed according to the DOJ? Wiz Imp Feb 10 #9
According to the NYT, "interfering with the loyalty, morale or discipline of the U.S. armed forces" muriel_volestrangler Feb 11 #30
That is great news! mysteryowl Feb 10 #10
That's illegal orders not legal orders WmChris Feb 10 #12
This UTUSN Feb 10 #24
So Pirro decided to go ahead and make herself look like a drunk fool again mdbl Feb 10 #13
She Was Born to the Role The Roux Comes First Feb 10 #26
For a small period of time, it looked like she might try to rehab mdbl Feb 11 #32
the J6 king himself, whining about "seditious behavior" Skittles Feb 10 #15
Good on them canetoad Feb 10 #16
Old "Drinky" Jeanine's batting average keeps dropping. LudwigPastorius Feb 10 #17
Here's the video of Chris Hayes' announcement: Rhiannon12866 Feb 10 #18
Now sue them for 20 Billion dollars! BidenRocks Feb 10 #19
YES!!!!!! calimary Feb 10 #20
Hooray! mahina Feb 10 #21
OMG, we won ONE LilElf70 Feb 10 #22
Can the grand jury transcripts be made public? Tasmanian Devil Feb 10 #25
Mark Kelly is worth a thousand tRumps. Dave Bowman Feb 10 #27
Bondi will try again Mz Pip Feb 10 #28
Dont celebrate yet Smackdown2019 Feb 10 #29
At least he should be in a good mood next week............ n/t DFW Feb 11 #31
Grand Jury Rebuffs Justice Dept. Attempt to Indict 6 Democrats in Congress (NYT Gift Subscription) LetMyPeopleVote Feb 11 #33
Good Botany Feb 11 #34
Excellent! Fuck you Pete Hegseth! Initech Feb 11 #35
Refuse ILLEGAL Orders, not Legal MineralMan Feb 11 #36
Excellent! ShazzieB Feb 11 #38
Fix your post Mysterian Feb 11 #40
People over power. And ultimately, we the people KPN Feb 11 #41
MaddowBlog-Dems enraged after Trump's DOJ targeted veterans with charges of seditious conspiracy LetMyPeopleVote Feb 11 #42
I expected this, given the fact that the Uniform Code of Military Justice states this quite clearly. patphil Feb 11 #43
No grand jurors found the Trump DOJ met low probable cause threshold in failed indictment of Democratic lawmakers LetMyPeopleVote Feb 11 #44
Deadline Legal Blog-Grand jury's refusal to indict Democrats joins a stunning pattern of DOJ rejections LetMyPeopleVote Feb 12 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chris Hayes reporting tha...»Reply #7