Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Buddyzbuddy

(2,358 posts)

11. It would be better for the DOJ

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Tue Feb 10, 2026, 02:55 AM

Tuesday

And Congress if the DOJ did the right thing on their own rather than Congress doing it for them. If Congress does it, we might get 10 names but if DOJ does it we could see hundreds of names. DOJ is dragging their feet and illegally redacting information BUT, they could still do the RIGHT thing.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Lawmakers Don't Rule Out Exposing Redacted Names [View all] applegrove Monday OP

Just saw Melanie Sansbury (sp) on MSNOW senseandsensibility Monday #1

Just do it. Lets not wait another 25 years for justice Deuxcents Monday #2

I'm not sure what they are jockeying for here by waiting? Ilikepurple Monday #7

I don't know what they're jockeying for either but it's time to stop walking on eggshells. Just do it. Deuxcents Monday #8

I hope those perverts are SHITTING BRICKS Skittles Monday #3

Bring it! Lulu KC Monday #4

I still find it bizarre Disaffected Monday #5

JUST FUCKING DO IT!! 2naSalit Monday #6

There is no excuse for not releasing as many names as they can at this point. Wiz Imp Monday #9

Just Six? DET Monday #10

It would be better for the DOJ Buddyzbuddy Tuesday #11