Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ilikepurple

(499 posts)
7. I'm not sure what they are jockeying for here by waiting?
Mon Feb 9, 2026, 10:04 PM
Monday

There are obviously complex legal questions here, but let us know what considerations are holding you back. The cynic in me says six is an awful standard number. I guess so is 5 or 10 or 12, but I hope they aren’t just negotiating who the lucky six will be. Sexual predators are not known for self correcting their behaviors, so many involved are likely to be involved with some other trafficking scenario. I know it’s somewhat simple minded to compare this with a fictional narrative. But, if I was watching a movie where after 25 years of horrors and coverups transparency emerged and multiple represtaives came out and said “if the questionable Justice Department does not comply with the law and release the names of the implicated we now know, we might have to do so ourselves”, my face would hit my palm and wonder how much longer the movie is going to be. Or even worse, is this one of those movies where the lesson is more about the inevitability of corruption rather than justice? I’m still hopeful, but now that we have a better understanding of the scope of Epstein’s operations, the paucity of leaks over the years challenges my faith.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lawmakers Don't Rule Out ...»Reply #7