Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Has anyone asked him whether he ever looked at the Epstein documents? If he had looked, doesn't it seem obvious that he would have done something to preserve the evidence from being destroyed by the next group coming in?
Maybe we're giving him too much credit. Maybe Garland really has been in cahoots with those who are desperate to cover everything up? I don't want to believe that, but this all looks so fishy now....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read