Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

UTUSN

(77,346 posts)

18. My main lesson from defending Bill the last time was, never again put an individual above the party's AGENDA.

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Wed Feb 4, 2026, 02:20 PM

Feb 4

When the dust settled, and it took years, my paradigm changed to regarding "leaders" only as instruments in the service of the Agenda, not as idols, and I then came to think that he should have resigned and let GORE take over. I defended him to the last ditch in real time based on purely partisan terms. As of now, I'm repulsed at the MAGAts doing this (again), but have no idea what or any involvement Bill has, but defending him now is not my option, just he can look out for himself.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Comeback Kid' no more: Dems aren't protecting the Clintons from Epstein scrutiny [View all] question everything Feb 4 OP

I think the Clintons don't want to be part of the circus Easterncedar Feb 4 #1

if epstein had anything on clinton that would be out in 2016 rampartd Feb 4 #7

And underlined in red, or something! electric_blue68 Feb 5 #25

I think there might be something else going on here... EarlG Feb 4 #2

It only sets a precedent in terms of norms and perception newdeal2 Feb 4 #3

I see this story as a nothingburger. Raven123 Feb 4 #4

The Clintons will show the nation they are good people. Kid Berwyn Feb 4 #5

It's mainly "Teh Deep State" that's going to be in the crosshairs in the upcoming House investigation AZJonnie Feb 4 #6

What a bullshit article from politico. The Democrats aren't protecting the Clintons, in fact they were publicly lostincalifornia Feb 4 #8

Weird article, like the "research" about the Democratic Party was Wikipedia and their mom or Uncle Stan. betsuni Feb 4 #16

Well said betsuni. lostincalifornia Feb 4 #17

The Clintons will be fine. Tommy Carcetti Feb 4 #9

Trump sounds scared. No more LoCk hEr UP! leftstreet Feb 4 #10

Good catch. Reminds me of what he said about Maxwell... Qutzupalotl Feb 4 #11

Comeback Kid was a phrase from 1992...that was 34 years ago! Prairie Gates Feb 4 #12

Hey, Al Franken got tossed overboard for not actually doing anything, so let the High Standards reign JHB Feb 4 #13

Maybe not the younger ones.. Lovie777 Feb 4 #14

I don't think Bill and Hillary need protection. comradebillyboy Feb 4 #15

The MAGA GOP invited two honey badgers over JCMach1 Feb 4 #19

thank you Skittles Feb 5 #24

Indeed she was not. Even 5 yr olds know... 3catwoman3 Feb 5 #27

My main lesson from defending Bill the last time was, never again put an individual above the party's AGENDA. UTUSN Feb 4 #18

No... lame54 Feb 4 #21

Not reframing what I lived. UTUSN Feb 4 #22

They need to drop Trump's name as much as possible lame54 Feb 4 #20

MaddowBlog-As Clintons prepare to answer questions about Epstein, Trump balks LetMyPeopleVote Feb 5 #23

The King of Delay JBTaurus83 Feb 5 #26

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Comeback Kid' no more: De...»Reply #18