General Discussion

for the Felon for no less than 10 years. Finally we have a law that requires the release of all of the evidence which is coming out selectively with the Felons name and pages and pages completely redacted by a corrupt DOJ but we are to believe the convicted Felon that lies as easily as he breaths, over a victim that swore under oath at the risk of perjury and civil suit.
This "argument" sounds like an audition to serve on the Felon's DOJ. It's one thing to argue the law but quite another to disregard the victim in doing so.
To quote "SHEESH.


BTW, a trial for whom? A sitting President that has received immunity from our corrupt SC to go as far as using Seal Team 6 to kill a political rival as long as it's done while he's President.

If, he were completely innocent, he had the authority and responsibility to release the files but his response was " some of the accused might get hurt. Ya think.

I don't even know if he could be charged but how does that relieve him of responsibility. The truth should be revealed. He's in politics, the leader of the most powerful Country in the history of the world but we shouldn't have an opinion based upon an abundance of information that leads us to believe he is guilty of nefarious actions.
Are you serious. This isn't 3rd year law where your arguing for argument's sake. This is real life with real victims and you want to defend that pig's right to obfuscate the law and then argue the law is for everybody.

Take a look, he's using the Constitution for toilet paper. There are lawyer's and judges fighting the good fight with righteous decisions that are tossed by the high court that is ignoring precedent and writing law from the bench.
So, I would kindly suggest not trying to stifle public opinion because right now it might keep us out of a civil war by allowing pressure to be released.