Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 94 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In Printz v. United State...»Reply #5
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: In Printz v. United States, SCOTUS held that the Constitution bars the federal government from forcing or otherwise ... [View all]

SergeStorms

(20,154 posts)
5. What Donald Trump knows about the laws of this country....
Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Wed Jan 28, 2026, 12:53 PM
Wednesday

could fit on top of a down quark.

Sorry, that's a little particle physics humor there.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

15 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

BeerBarrelPolkaAttilatheblondthe nelmZackzzzzRay BrunsOl Janx SpiritKS ToronadotwodogsbarkinghomegirlTasmanian DevilWednesdaysenigmaniadickthegrouchcksmithyprogressoid
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In Printz v. United States, SCOTUS held that the Constitution bars the federal government from forcing or otherwise ... [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Wednesday OP
Kick dalton99a Wednesday #1
Yeah, that was back when they believed in "state's rights," and Democrats were in control. sop Wednesday #2
Bloviating fear again bucolic_frolic Wednesday #3
I see the giant anus is spewing shit again UpInArms Wednesday #4
What Donald Trump knows about the laws of this country.... SergeStorms Wednesday #5
Trump's understanding of the law is limited to the Supreme Court said I could break any law I wanted. Lonestarblue Wednesday #6
So you grew up with endless mocking too? BidenRocks Wednesday #9
Somebody oughta Just Jerome Wednesday #11
Yeah, but in Trump v. FUCKYALLIAMTHELAW quakerboy Wednesday #7
The Scalia ruling sounds like a slippery slope if applied to other nonimmigration federal laws. live love laugh Wednesday #8
They do not opt out of federal laws, they just can't be compelled to enforce federal laws for the federal government. Ol Janx Spirit Wednesday #10
Thanks for clarifying that. live love laugh Wednesday #12
"Playing with fire" does colonel bonespurs plan on nuking them?. Buddyzbuddy Wednesday #13
Stare decisis is no longer sacrosanct for the majority of the current Supreme Court BumRushDaShow Wednesday #14
I'm so old I can remember when the Repukes believed in "states' rights" FakeNoose Wednesday #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In Printz v. United State...»Reply #5
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2026 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.