Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The coverup continues Blues Heron Dec 19 #1
Well. If this is a transcript of a videotaped deposition, Volaris Dec 19 #2
Good point. Wiz Imp Dec 19 #7
Let the motions and lawsuits to compel compliance begin pat_k Dec 19 #3
It's explicitly stated in the law what can and can't be redacted. Wiz Imp Dec 19 #6
Protecting the criminals. Color me surprised! NOT! BComplex Dec 19 #13
Huh? These restrictions in the law are expicitly to NOT protect the criminals. Wiz Imp Dec 19 #16
Got it! BComplex Dec 20 #23
I understand they have to list legal reasons why each and every redaction was made. halobeam Dec 19 #20
Yep. I believe everything you said is correct. Wiz Imp Dec 20 #22
They probably will claim that [redacted] os an ongoing investigation Bluetus Dec 20 #30
Besides the general hideousness of this (and all the girls, young women violated)... electric_blue68 Dec 19 #4
All redactions by law, were supposed to come with Emile Dec 19 #5
I think that is what is due 15 days from today? halobeam Dec 20 #21
And the Trump Administration moved Maxwell to a much cushier prison too. Botany Dec 19 #8
Agreed. And given the specific question about Victoria's Secret lingerie Wiz Imp Dec 19 #9
Les Wexner is the person behind Victoria's Secrets and the brand but he would have no interest in a woman Botany Dec 19 #12
Sorry, but info released in January 2024 confirms it WAS Wexner she was talking about. Wiz Imp Dec 19 #15
That is surprising Botany Dec 19 #18
Wow. Who is questioning her? Demanding, borderline mean. Horrible. Joinfortmill Dec 19 #10
This was in relation to lawsuit against Alan Dershowitz brought by Giuffre's lawyer. Wiz Imp Dec 19 #11
Ah, that explains it. Joinfortmill Dec 19 #14
Working link: Celerity Dec 19 #17
The only way Bondi will release this is when she sees the handcuffs coming for her. mn9driver Dec 19 #19
Guiffre's 2015 testimony against Maxwell in her civil case mentioned in the OP has long been publicly available AZJonnie Dec 20 #24
I won't dispute any of the points you make, however you are wrong about one thing. Wiz Imp Dec 20 #25
Okay, my bad. I thought your post was in two parts, top and bottom (2015 and 2016 testimonies) AZJonnie Dec 20 #26
Like I said. I agree. Especially about Bondi. Wiz Imp Dec 20 #28
I don't think she understood that president and prime minister are essentially the same thing. everyonematters Dec 20 #27
I think the questioner was trying to trip her up. Wiz Imp Dec 20 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»*****Updated***** I pulle...»Reply #1