Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZJonnie

(2,839 posts)
6. If it's a picture of somebody with a minor, or discussing minors in a sexual context, then for sure YES!
Thu Dec 18, 2025, 12:47 PM
Dec 18

But I'm personally not super-interested in seeing everyone in the world he was ever in a picture with, or even that travelled on the plane, get blasted by the public.

The reason for the latter being that the pilots testified as federal prosecution witnesses against Maxwell in her criminal case saying they never saw any minors apart from Guiffre flying on the plane (asserting they didn't know at the time she was only 17), or evidence of any sexual activity on the plane, and that they were 100% free to move about the cabin on every flight.

Pics and/or messages of everyone who can at least tangentially be associated with his attacks on minors I agree 100%, but I'm not calling for "everyone who ever knew or spoke to the guy" because I'm not generally a fan of guilt by association.

I mean, a pic of Chomsky and Epstein was released today. Do I think Chomsky was involved? Fuck no. Do I think he knew and said nothing? I also highly doubt it.

So no, not "everyone", with no filter or discretion. MHO I've already shared, and I know some of you disagree, that's fine. This would be my vote on the topic of the OP.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Agree or disagree: If Bon...»Reply #6