Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

harumph

(3,077 posts)
3. I hear you. I would support 30 to life for the most severe financial crimes against the public interest
Sun Dec 14, 2025, 09:21 AM
Sunday

But what constitutes such a crime should be very well defined. In other words, the bar must be very high. The parties to the crime must be proven to have been (not just) aware of the crime but aided the crime by active measures such as colluding with other companies (e.g., price fixing) or the proffering of bribes to public officials, insider trading. Being simply aware of theft, bribery and other financial corruption (and not reporting it), should carry a lesser but still severe punishment. In order to scare people who apparently (as we now know) lack any morals or social conscience, there would need to be very strong banking and corporate transparency laws so that shell companies and the like are more easily tracked. Rent seeking behaviors by the market would be monitored. IOW, these m'fers require some department looking over their shoulder. Said department should be constitutionally created by amendment - given extraordinary investigative powers - mandatory funding and excluded from so-called government shutdowns and protected from political pressure or meddling. Basically it would be similar to the DOJ but specifically for financial corruption. I would elevate financial crimes of theft above other types of thefts. The financial class and their political helpers are openly stealing from our children's' future which will mean the loss of job opportunities, lack of healthcare and impoverishment and death. IMO, the only corruption crime that should carry the death penalty would be knowingly supplying our military with defective equipment - like the cheap "bullet-proof" vests some jackhole contractor sold the DOD in the Iraq war. For that you get the firing squad.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gen Z revolt in Europe's ...»Reply #3