General Discussion

But in my final post on the subject for now, YES I am positively *asserting* that The House Committee on Oversight and Accountability IS in a position of increased imprimatur vs the average citizen.

To the point where I'd OPINE that they're obliged to display some reticence when it comes to putting out pictures of people with Epstein, and in particular, people who were not PREVIOUSLY shown to the public in pictures. They should be cognizant of the fact that they could mess with people's lives who are guilty of absolutely no wrong-doing other then being in a picture with Epstein.

I'd also OPINE that it's not right for them to do so with no regard for any standards. I don't like that it happened to Summers, or the US VI Rep. Not because I love Larry Summers. But because of principles that are inherently MY OPINION. If it doesn't bother you, that's also a valid position, we have differing opinions in this regard.

Another piece that's opinion is that I can't look up House Committee on Oversight and Accountability in the dictionary or elsewhere and find the words "a group which is perceived by everyone in the US public as having increased imprimatur vs. average citizens". I therefore recognize this assertion as being "my opinion". I could sit and argue WHY that is my opinion, but I don't care to ATM. We could back and forth it all night and it will always come down to your opinion vs. mine.

BUT ... I'm not someone who cheaply cops out in the way you're seemingly accusing me of, so I take a small offense there. I'll try to revisit this with you another time