Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(6,998 posts)

11. Nowhere in the (very short) article is....

Fri Dec 12, 2025, 04:46 PM

Dec 12

... manipulation mentioned. Powell did not say anything about "manipulation."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Fed Chair Warns Trump Admin May Be Seriously Exaggerating Jobs Numbers" [View all] moniss Dec 11 OP

Define "seriously exaggerating" gab13by13 Dec 11 #1

As the article notes the numbers are moniss Dec 11 #3

Was it "bald-faced lying" by any chance? jmowreader Dec 12 #10

*pretends to be shocked* sakabatou Dec 11 #4

No shit. Solly Mack Dec 11 #5

Huh! Are We Supposed to Get Up on That?!? The Roux Comes First Dec 11 #6

I had the same conversations here with former gov't. statisticians. Buddyzbuddy Dec 12 #7

He seems to be pointing out a systemic issue.... reACTIONary Dec 12 #8

Manipulation can mean the numbers never moniss Dec 12 #9

Nowhere in the (very short) article is.... reACTIONary Dec 12 #11

I'm the one making the statement in a general response moniss Dec 12 #12

Thanks - I've got it. reACTIONary Dec 12 #13

That's not what Powell said EdmondDantes_ Dec 12 #14

The differences between the "normal" moniss Dec 13 #15