Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bottomofthehill

(9,337 posts)

1. Massachusetts Harris 60 Trump 36

Reply to msongs (Original post)

Fri Dec 5, 2025, 08:35 PM

Dec 5

Does that mean the republicans in Massachusetts should not pay taxes….. they have representation, the majority of the voters voted for someone else, that does not mean they are not represented. It means a minority are represented by someone they did not vote for

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Indiana - possible lawsuit for no taxation without representation"? [View all] msongs Dec 5 OP

Massachusetts Harris 60 Trump 36 bottomofthehill Dec 5 #1

It's a question of PARTISAN GERRYMANDERING. Something the five black-robbed men on the court in 2019 treasonously ruled pat_k Dec 5 #4

you are still represented even if you don't like the representative. Takket Dec 5 #2

My answer is in post 4 pat_k Dec 5 #6

Tragically, I think the five black-robbed traitors that were on SCOTUS in 2019 made that impossible. pat_k Dec 5 #3

You're spot on! I call it the "Hoosier Iron Curtain" Emile Dec 5 #5

Would you suppose Massachusetts Republicans have similar grounds for a lawsuit? tritsofme Dec 5 #7