Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How do you use ChatGPT and others like it in your daily life? [View all]ruet
(10,172 posts)35. Ask and Ye Shall Receive
ME
What is the equivalent of Polaris (polar north star used for navigation) on Mars?
CGPT
Mars does not have a bright star like Polaris near its north celestial pole, so there isn't a direct equivalent of the North Star on Mars. However, the star Deneb (in the constellation Cygnus) is relatively close to Mars' north celestial pole. Although not as precisely aligned or as bright as Polaris is for Earth, Deneb serves as a rough reference point for Mars' north celestial pole.
For the south celestial pole on Mars, the nearest star is Kappa Velorum (in the constellation Vela), though its also not a perfect alignment. Navigators on Mars would likely use other methods, such as landmarks, technology, or star charts, instead of relying on a single "north star" for orientation.
ME
How is Deneb not as bright as Polaris? Deneb has an apparent magnitude of 1.25 and Polaris 1.98.
CGPT
You're correct that Deneb is indeed brighter than Polaris in terms of apparent magnitude. Deneb, with an apparent magnitude of about 1.25, is one of the brightest stars in the night sky, whereas Polaris has an apparent magnitude of about 1.98. Thank you for catching that!
To those not in the know, Deneb can be almost three times as bright as Polaris.
There was another one where I asked it to calculate the transit time to M31 at some percentage of the speed of light. It used the diameter of the Milky as the distance to M31. I don't have the transcript for that one. These are errors on very, very basic information.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've found that for the little things I've listed it's usually accurate. I treat it...
LAS14
Yesterday
#14
Please don't assume any answers from it or the others are correct. Even on simple things where even the online news
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#10
So you're fine with it having been trained on stolen intellectual property? You don't care about
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#28
lol why would I use an earth-burning plagiarism machine that's unreliable
WhiskeyGrinder
Yesterday
#19
It's pretty easy to proof the questions I put to it in categories 1 and 2. As for...
LAS14
23 hrs ago
#53
Never used Chat GPT. Have used AI to figure out how to prepare a piece of
allegorical oracle
Yesterday
#22
What should you call it? An illegally trained plagiarism tool that dumbs you down while harming the environment.
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#25
LLMs like GPT are restricted by "Safety guardrails" so they don't offend anyone. That's the cause of most hallucinations
Hellbound Hellhound
Yesterday
#31
Of all the reasons given for LLM hallucinations, guardrails have never been mentioned in all the
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#36
No need to get personal here, mate. My principles are just fine, exactly where they belong.
Hellbound Hellhound
Yesterday
#43
The AI companies knew they were guilty of IP theft and copyright infringement. There's plenty of
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#48
Other than a handful of times out of shear curiosity, I haven't touched it.
Tommy Carcetti
Yesterday
#50
I have not used it for my daily personal life, but have used it to help write stuff for work.
beaglelover
Yesterday
#51