Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Wiz Imp

(8,501 posts)

6. Update: it would be absolutely impossible for 0.6% of the precincts

Reply to SSJVegeta (Reply #5)

Thu Dec 4, 2025, 07:56 PM

Dec 4

in this district to account for 31,000 votes. In 2024, the most votes in a single precinct in that district was just over 4000. The total number of precincts in the district is just 230. That means, 0.6% of the precincts represents a single precinct.

Sorry, your speculation is easily proven wrong in this case.

Complete data by precinct available here: https://sos.tn.gov/elections/results#2025

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Chemical Bill amortus716 KS Toronado Texas_Blue_Dem Wednesdays

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BREAKING: Election Advocates Demand Recount in Tennessee [View all] sheshe2 Dec 4 OP

1% of precincts could be 31,000 votes. A precinct isnt defined by number of people or % of votes SSJVegeta Dec 4 #1

It would be nearly impossible for 0.6% of the precincts in the District Wiz Imp Dec 4 #4

Those are still averages though. We are talking about a county with both a large rural and urban population SSJVegeta Dec 4 #5

Update: it would be absolutely impossible for 0.6% of the precincts Wiz Imp Dec 4 #6

(Post deleted due to being off a factor of 10) SSJVegeta Dec 4 #7

This message was self-deleted by its author padfun Dec 4 #10

0.6percent of 230 is 1.38 not 13. Something isn't mathing. mackdaddy Dec 4 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta Dec 4 #14

This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta Dec 4 #16

So the claim is that DDHQ reported 99.4% reporting SSJVegeta Dec 4 #17

My experience was voters Deminpenn Dec 4 #21

That would have been my guess, but I'm pretty sure I read Wiz Imp Dec 4 #25

Scrap that. I see now this was brought forth by Thhis Will Hold Wiz Imp Dec 4 #32

K&R spanone Dec 4 #2

You don't get hand recounts in a nine point loss FBaggins Dec 4 #3

There was no 31k vote "jump" and nobody is calling for a recount cmmngrnd Dec 4 #8

I'm afraid it will become the norm to claim "We was Robbed," every time someone loses "on both sides." Silent Type Dec 4 #12

which the Trump maggot Republicans 'normalized' ! Jack Valentino Dec 4 #26

Exactly, but we ain't got to do it too. Silent Type Dec 4 #27

Yeah, that last poll that showed the race within two points Jack Valentino Dec 4 #28

That is true. I'd applaud the changes, but not in a sure loser like this one unless some honest to gawd bombshell Silent Type Dec 4 #29

I love your post. sheshe2 Dec 4 #31

That's it iemanja Friday #34

Post removed Post removed Dec 4 #19

It would be easy to prove the election advocates wrong. Chemical Bill Dec 4 #9

Recounts very rarely change the outcome by 0.5% iemanja Dec 4 #15

I think cheating by Republicans... Chemical Bill Dec 4 #18

I can tell you my recollection iemanja Dec 4 #22

My recollection is... Chemical Bill Dec 4 #24

It's about Jill Stein in the sense she collected money iemanja Friday #33

You said Jill Stein kept the money... Chemical Bill Friday #35

This is what Trump and his supremacist, KPN Dec 4 #11

Recommended. H2O Man Dec 4 #20

Let them pay for it Jose Garcia Dec 4 #23

Same grifters Boo1 Dec 4 #30