Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

canetoad

(19,986 posts)
19. Exactly
Tue Dec 2, 2025, 08:04 PM
Dec 2

Although the Daily Beast says explicitly; "Either he accepted the mission, or his family in Afghanistan would be beaten, murdered, and possibly beheaded."

It's always possible that the Taliban entered the US and tracked him down, but the above sentence looks like a straight-out lie.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I guess the Taliban's Camp David invitation got lost in the mail newdeal2 Dec 2 #1
If true, Safe as Milk Dec 2 #2
One of the rare times you see "stunning" used in a headline and it's not an exaggeration. sop Dec 2 #3
These kinds of scenarios... ultralite001 Dec 2 #4
Trump directly benefits from this shooting. Irish_Dem Dec 2 #5
He benefitted from Charlie Kirk's murder as well n/t TexasBushwhacker Dec 2 #6
At the very least Trump is creating a hostile, violent environment. Irish_Dem Dec 3 #36
I can believe the Taliban hit squad did the threatening at Brother Buzz Dec 2 #8
And remember, it was Trump who insisted that 5,000 Taliban prisoners be released before he left office. Lonestarblue Dec 2 #15
Trump is releasing dangerous criminals for a number of reasons. Irish_Dem Dec 3 #37
Yes it is how a crime syndicate operates. Irish_Dem Dec 3 #40
Yes, it is possible the theory about the Taliban is being bandied about . . . John1956PA Dec 2 #13
Yes exactly. Let's blame foreign bad guys. Irish_Dem Dec 3 #38
Two sides of the same coin NBachers Dec 2 #25
Yes all members of the GOP/Trump/Putin crime syndicate. Irish_Dem Dec 3 #39
Any legit news sources reporting this? WarGamer Dec 2 #7
Do you not consider The Daily Beast a legit news source? W_HAMILTON Dec 2 #10
Why not rely on AP, Reuters or NYT, Axios or ABC/CBS? WarGamer Dec 2 #12
From the BBC canetoad Dec 2 #14
TYVM... so the BBC doesn't confirm the Daily Beast "claim" WarGamer Dec 2 #16
I'm still reading the BBC article canetoad Dec 2 #17
Yes. But I see no evidence he was coerced by the Taliban to commit the crime. WarGamer Dec 2 #18
Exactly canetoad Dec 2 #19
The DB article uses the phrase "may have been" Another Jackalope Dec 2 #27
It's also just as easily a way to get clicks without saying anything EdmondDantes_ Dec 2 #31
Would the Taliban own it? Probably not. Marcuse Dec 2 #9
They wouldn't own it AdamGG Dec 2 #11
If so, he may double cross his benefactors with more wag the dog missiles. Marcuse Dec 2 #24
Petie is neither a war secretary nor is he a "war" secretary Fullduplexxx Dec 2 #20
Certainly worth looking into more deeply duckworth969 Dec 2 #21
I Knew There Was More To It Deep State Witch Dec 2 #22
It certainly seemed like an assignment mainer Dec 2 #23
"Hello? This is John Barron of the Taliban . . ." NBachers Dec 2 #26
This may or may not be true, but it makes far more sense than just saying he went cookoo and went for a drive. flashman13 Dec 2 #28
Is this at all related? usonian Dec 2 #29
This needs to be broadcast far and wide RazorbackExpat Dec 2 #34
Doing my part. I found it on DU (Sorry, I can't give credit) but please share widely. usonian Dec 2 #35
At least the guy gets a trial, right, Captain Zero Dec 2 #30
PTSD from helping America BidenRocks Dec 2 #32
Trump's Taliban pals. Norrrm Dec 2 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fed Probe Stunning Twist ...»Reply #19