Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

eppur_se_muova

(41,080 posts)

4. Should be easier to modify the 22nd Amendment to allow more than two NON-CONSECUTIVE terms than to allow

Reply to USS_Dauntless (Original post)

Wed Oct 8, 2025, 08:04 AM

Oct 2025

more than two terms generally. Of course, that could help Anus Orange, but it would open the door for Obama as well.

If SCOTUS says Turnip can run for a third term (which would be directly succeeding his second term), Dems would be pretty stupid NOT to nominate Obama. Turnip wouldn't agree to ANY debates but Obama could out-social media him any day.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

niyad KPN byronius

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Because FUCK IT. Why not? [View all] USS_Dauntless Oct 2025 OP

Love it! Chasstev365 Oct 2025 #1

Me too! Gimpyknee Oct 2025 #2

Me three! calimary Oct 2025 #25

Because Trump has not served 2 consecutive terms. Kind of like Russia. LiberalArkie Oct 2025 #11

Trump hasn't served two consecutive terms. Dave Id Oct 2025 #15

Exactly. the reich-wing believe that the constitutional limit is on "consecutive" terms. LiberalArkie Oct 2025 #16

Not surprisingly, they are mistaken. TomSlick Oct 2025 #23

exactly, why not? the orange asshole and his room full of dopes want to illegally weekend at Bernies him, Javaman Oct 2025 #3

Should be easier to modify the 22nd Amendment to allow more than two NON-CONSECUTIVE terms than to allow eppur_se_muova Oct 2025 #4

SCOTUS has already told us that the plain language of constitutional amendments is meaningless Oliver Bolliver Butt Oct 2025 #22

I'm hoping he's out of the White House by 2028 IzzaNuDay Oct 2025 #29

If shithead runs for a 3rd term mountain grammy Oct 2025 #5

Shithead has already overstayed his welcome. lastlib Oct 2025 #6

Hell, I'd vote for this guy vs any republican SocialDemocrat61 Oct 2025 #7

Man...those delta radiation burns are a bitch! LudwigPastorius Oct 2025 #21

Michelle is available for conscription! druidity33 Oct 2025 #8

Gorge Washington was drafted. Did not want to run either. multigraincracker Oct 2025 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author Rebl2 Oct 2025 #14

You misunderstand... druidity33 Oct 2025 #17

True Rebl2 Oct 2025 #20

Why not Hillary? Deuxcents Oct 2025 #24

Why not Bill? Ponietz Oct 2025 #27

it will be an interesting shasdow docket decision rampartd Oct 2025 #9

This thread just gave me a new talking point idea for Rs KS Toronado Oct 2025 #10

As a thought experiment? Prairie_Seagull Oct 2025 #12

In a HEARTBEAT. Maru Kitteh Oct 2025 #18

Absolutely genius! KPN Oct 2025 #19

Yes wendyb-NC Oct 2025 #26

One thing I'd like to see area51 Oct 2025 #28

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Because FUCK IT. Why not?»Reply #4