General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'The Situation: In Defense of Merrick Garland' [View all]bigtree
(93,319 posts)...very little of what Congress uncovered and presented was used in either prosecution.
Congress actually focused on the links between protestors and the Trump WH, the 'foot soldiers that all the critics deride Garland for zeroing in on first, and if you bother to look at the actual investigation you will see that the Garland DOJ immediately set about investigating just that, BEFORE Congress held one hearing.
There wasn't ONE top Trump lawyer or aide investigated by Congress, who's testimony GARLAND's prosecutors forced by fighting through successive courts to have their attorney or other privileges removed, and who's testimony is KEY in the actual indictments.
Not one Trump WH official, just sassy Hutchinson whose testimony legal novices believed was going to be as consequential as all of the internet and teevee fantasy prosecutors told them it would be.
call to action icon
For months, the FBI and a team of prosecutors looked for potential links between Trumps inner circle and the Proud Boys, whose leader was ultimately found guilty of seditious conspiracy and is serving 22 years in prison, the longest sentence of any January 6 defendant.
Investigators spent much of that summer poring over call records of Proud Boys members and conducting scores of interviews. They homed in on a period in late 2020, when an informant alleged an interaction between Trump or his inner circle and the Proud Boys occurred.
Prosecutors inside the Justice Department also dug through reams of opaque financial records, searching for any direct links between Trump and the organizations that brought Stop the Steal rallygoers to Washington for his speech ahead of the Capitol attack. From there, they examined the so-called war room setup at the Willard hotel in Washington, where Steve Bannon and other Trump supporters strategized how to thwart the certification of Joe Bidens electoral victory.
In the end, no direct criminal links to Trump emerged. The suspected Proud Boys meeting, the Willard hotel room and the rally fundraising were all dead ends.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-judge-weigh-path-forward-100455749.html
...weird how this 'dead end' that Congress and Nicolle Wallace and others got people all frothy about, claiming the congressional committe was god's gift to prosecuting Trump, is the same thing Garland was spending his time investigating, along with the rest of the more substantive evidence that followed which became available by successfully fighting the court challenges.
Weird to be touting congressional hearings in which ALL of the evidence they gathered and ALL of the depositions and other communications they obtained were WITHHELD by them from DOJ until the FALL of 2023.
The Select Committees failure to grant the Department access to these transcripts complicates the Departments ability to investigate and prosecute those who engaged in criminal conduct in relation to the January 6 attack on the Capitol, DOJ wrote in a letter Wednesday, signed by Assistant Attorneys General Kenneth Polite, Jr. and Matthew Olsen, as well as U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves.
The DOJ officials said it was critical that the panel provide prosecutors copies of the transcripts of all its witness interviews.
Prosecutors agreed Thursday to delay a scheduled August trial of the leadership of the Proud Boys, a pro-Trump militia group, citing the prejudice caused by the select committees public hearings, which are ongoing for much of this month. The leaders are facing seditious conspiracy charges for their activities on Jan. 6. The proposed trial delay to December backed by some defendants would require the approval of the federal judge handling the case.
In addition to the transcript dispute, prosecutors are facing increasing complaints from defense attorneys that the Jan. 6 panel releasing selected details of their investigation including in currently ongoing public hearings is unfair to their clients. They are demanding access to all the records and have expressed concerns that they might all be abruptly made public right in the middle of a Proud Boys trial.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/16/tensions-escalate-as-doj-renews-request-for-jan-6-panel-transcripts-00040267