Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lees1975

(6,956 posts)
13. A nice crock of baloney.
Wed Aug 20, 2025, 08:56 AM
Aug 2025

The DOJ is an executive branch department with executive branch resources. They could have moved as fast as they wanted with as many resources as they wanted. I'm sick of these turf protecting apologetics for Merrick Garland. He was an incompetent boob, and Biden was fearful of anything Trump, because it might "look political." And that is the reason why Trump did not get brought to justice, disqualified from running for office and put in prison for insurrection. If the party labels were switched, the whole entourage would be occupying cells at Guantanamo right now, that's how the GOP would have handled it.

Garland was handed a Congressional investigation with mountains of evidence. He should have had a prosecuting team waiting, receiving that in real time, and brought charges to issue indictments based on all of that. The possibilities were endless, according to individuals as distinguished and experienced as Joyce Vance and Jill Wine-Banks.

The Democrats had control of both houses and the White House, starting in 2021. Were it not for the turf-protecting, job protecting desire to remain in office forever, we might have had enough members of the house and senate with the guts and fortitude to pack the Supreme Court early in Biden's term, overturn Citizens United, undo all of that ridiculous Presidential immunity crap, saved Roe and blew all of Trump's dilly dallying delays out of the water, and gotten both the insurrection case and the document theft case into court in January of 2023 at the very latest. That's what competent, and resolute politicians would have done.

Try and argue that point, huh? That if we had done this, we would not be where we are now. And explain why Democrats weren't willing to take the risk and use their power, huh?

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ben Wittes at Lawfare bigtree Aug 2025 #1
I have stated my opinion numerous times gab13by13 Aug 2025 #2
Right? Cosmocat Aug 2025 #15
A simple question: Chasstev365 Aug 2025 #3
you didn't figure in any republican judge or justice bigtree Aug 2025 #6
The long stretch of inactivity, and the long stretch that followed of minimal activity, Scrivener7 Aug 2025 #4
The case is: he failed, and he projected a meek quality that made him a natural scapegoat, who deserved it. Blues Heron Aug 2025 #5
we failed to back him up with our votes bigtree Aug 2025 #8
The last sentence makes sense to me. yardwork Aug 2025 #7
I guess no one is defending edhopper Aug 2025 #9
This boils down to "Garland was slow, but the Supreme Court might have blocked him anyway, and Republican voters muriel_volestrangler Aug 2025 #10
where, specifically are you claiming Garland was 'slow'? bigtree Aug 2025 #11
From the article: muriel_volestrangler Aug 2025 #12
'optimal speed' bigtree Aug 2025 #14
Fall 2021 - there's a delay of over 6 months. And a "slow-moving" strategy was the wrong one muriel_volestrangler Aug 2025 #17
jesus, do you know anything about prosecutions? bigtree Aug 2025 #18
Trump should have been the priority, not the rioters muriel_volestrangler Aug 2025 #19
Garland treated BOTH as a priority bigtree Aug 2025 #20
Apart from the failure to bring Trump to court before the 2024 election muriel_volestrangler Aug 2025 #21
Trump's indictment was actually IN COURT when we voted bigtree Aug 2025 #23
"In court" - meaning charges were listed, not that Trump was in court, with evidence being laid before a jury muriel_volestrangler Aug 2025 #28
there was a judge assigned, holding hearings in a courtroom who was approving all of the evidence bigtree Aug 2025 #29
A nice crock of baloney. lees1975 Aug 2025 #13
they moved as fast as the courts allowed bigtree Aug 2025 #16
Congress laid out the evidence in an investigation that was as complete as anything the DOJ had done lees1975 Aug 2025 #27
read the Smith report bigtree Aug 2025 #30
Imagine having "Defending Merrick Garland" be your political priority in 2025 thebigidea Aug 2025 #22
I'm more comfortable defending people who prosecuted Trump than attacking them bigtree Aug 2025 #24
He should have appointed Jack Smith immediately, rather than 2 years later. Bluepinky Aug 2025 #25
show us specifically where that would have made a difference bigtree Aug 2025 #32
He gave them a hat (to buy) MaineBlueBear Aug 2025 #26
I have zero problem with people defending Marrick Garland. gab13by13 Aug 2025 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'The Situation: In Defens...»Reply #13